What do you think?
Rate this book
279 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1928
She hated white people with a deep and burning hatred, with the kind of hatred which, finding itself held in sufficiently numerous groups, was capable someday, on some great provocation, of bursting into dangerously malignant flames.As much as things have changed and as much new material I've been exposed to, my ratings for Larsen's works have not. I'd follow this up with a common "for good or for ill", but considering the track record I've been having with revisiting authors who have penned favorites, I'm going to stay content with the good. Much as Larsen specializes in the pithy, I found each of her short stories a bit too short, the minute twitches of her razor sharp analysis of emotions compacted a side too much into the realm of melodrama to make for quality engagement. Her novels, though, give her incisive whip crack of a wit and writing style enough room to fly to endings which, if unhappy, are all too realistic, and soaked to the gills with a world that the US has not, for all its efforts to deny such, moved past.
But she aped their clothes, their manners, and their gracious ways of living.
[N]o matter what the intensity of his feelings or desires might be, he was not the sort of man who would for any reason give up one particle of his own good opinion of himself.It's not actually a good thing for a classic to still be relevant due to its particular descriptions of institutionalized pain and oppression. This gives the group that has been dishing out such an excuse to render its view of the constructed Other myopic, as evidenced by the plethora of slave narratives receiving adulation in the film awards and other such trumpeted evaluation systems. The creative mind is free, but if the only images of certain groups that are raised to the easily accessible realm of public perception are those consigning them to hell on earth, it renders fiction just another tool of the hegemonic armory. It's a good thing, then, that Larsen has the skill to take on not only antiblackness, but the associated misogynoir and trope of the tragic mulatto in a fashion that, while focused on heroines forced to face monsters they never should have faced, redirects and deconstructs every threat faced, physical and non. This is the difference between fiction and solidification: the first takes life and gives it the means to set itself free, while the second slops together a various selection of dehumanizations and slews it out for the sake of status-quo reinforcing entertainment and the next injection of capitalism's carrot.
In that second she saw that she could bear anything, but only if no one knew that she had anything to bear.After a reread, I can see why Passing is clinically superior: it is less erratic, more believable, and shapes itself around the more volatile segments of Quicksand rather than centering itself through it. However, as unbelievably as Helen Crane hurls herself through life, the leaps of faith she makes again and again are much closer to my heart and my own experiences than the tenacious grip Irene Redfield keeps on her domestic stability, and so the more self-contained and plot arc-conforming pass me by by a smidgen. One thing Passing has in it that Quicksand doesn't have is intimations at bisexuality, and while the Wiki goes straight for lesbianism, the most Irene does is find both men (yes, even her husband/so called beard) and women extremely attractive, so monosexuals are just going to have to chill. I'll also admit that Passing has the better ending.
Here were no tatters and rags, no beggars. But, then, begging, she learned, was an offense punishable by law.I look forward to future rereads.
No, the woman sitting there staring at her couldn't possibly know. [...] Nevertheless, Irene felt, in turn, anger, scorn, and fear slide over her. It wasn't that she was ashamed of being a Negro, or even of having it declared. It was the idea of being ejected from any place, even in the polite and tactful way in which the Drayton would probably do it, that disturbed her.
always had that pale gold hair, which, unsheared still, was drawn loosely back from a broad brow, partly hidden by the small close hat. Her lips, painted a brilliant geranium red, were sweet and sensitive and a little obstinate. A tempting mouth. The face across the forehead and cheeks was a trifle too wide, but the ivory skin had a peculiar soft luster. And the eyes were magnificent! Dark, sometimes absolutely black, always luminous, and set in long, black lashes. Arresting eyes, slow and mesmeric, and with, for all their warmth, something withdrawn and secret about them.
Ah! Surely! They were Negro eyes! Mysterious and concealing. and set in that ivory face under that bright hair, there was about them something exotic.