Trevor Bryce

This entry in Osprey's "Warrior" series has the distinction of being written by a major scholar of the Hittites, but in most respects it's pretty typical of the breed; a decent introduction, but leaves me wanting more. It's perhaps more honest than most about what's actually known and what's more-or-less reliably inferred.

Another unusual feature is that many of the interior illustrations are stills from a Turkish-American documentary movie, that show actors reenacting various moments from Hittite history. I dunno if I think it was a good idea. (But I'm quite curious why apparently every soldier in one of the stills is left-handed.) The plates, by Adam Hock, mostly show action scenes rather than detailed reconstructions of soldiers - a minus for wargamers - but still contrive to give a rather static impression.… (more)

When you are the crossroads of the ancient Near Eastern world, you’re going to experience a lot of drama. And empires.

That’s probably the most concise way of explaining the history presented in Ancient Syria: A Three Thousand Year History by Trevor Bryce.

The period in question at its greatest extent is around 2600 BCE to 730 CE; the author’s primary focus is from 2300 BCE to around 280 CE. The author chronicles the Bronze Age kingdoms of Ebla and Mari, the influence of Mesopotamian empires and Mitanni, the Hittites, the Egyptian Empire of its New Kingdom, the collapse of the Bronze Age and the Syro-Hittite kingdoms which arose in the Early Iron Age, and then the litany of empires: Assyrian, Babylonian, Persian, Greek - primarily Seleucid but some Ptolemaic, and then, of course, the Romans. The author also highlights the rise and fall of Palmyra. The rest of Roman and Byzantine Syria is quickly covered in what amounts to an afterword.

If you’re looking for the “great man” approach to history, and an expansive overview over a large region and time, then this work will do very well for you. A particular strength is the detail in which the author covers the Seleucid Empire; normally it is passed over quickly in favor of Rome.

The two main challenges I have with the work involve geography and focus.

“Syria” is a nebulous being. The very term itself expresses the challenge: “Syria” is the Greek rendering of Assyria, and the Greeks were coming of age and exploring their world right at the time the Assyrian Empire was fading and would ultimately collapse. If anything, the greatest reminder of the Assyrian Empire is how it would give its name to a wide swath of its western holdings.

But that’s the problem: “Syria” was only part of the “Assyrian Empire.” Those from the areas between Anatolia and the Assyrian heartland would resent being given the name of the people who overcame and oppressed them.

It would seem “Syria” is really the area the Greeks and Romans considered “Syria,” roughly between Anatolia and the Euphrates, and at some times, all the way down to Egypt. Such is why Israelite and Jewish history are also considered in this work.

But in the process eastern areas of modern Syria get short shrift; the Parthians and Sassanids are only discussed inasmuch as they are influencing the story of the Seleucid and Roman territories of Syria.

Beyond this, as a “great man” history, the last we hear much about “Syrians” themselves are…in the days of Assyria. There’s a lot of great information about the various Syrian states before the Assyrians in this work, but once we get to Assyrian dominance, the story now becomes all about the people who ruled over Syria and the Syrians. Discussion of religion is almost non-existent; what might be known about ancient Syrian cultures or societies will not be found here.

Thus this work is good for what it is: a political history of “Syria” as conceived of by the Seleucids and Romans, projected back in history to the Early Bronze Age and extending to the fall of Palmyra with a coda regarding everything up to the days of the Islamic conquest. But to learn more about ancient Syrians, one will have to look elsewhere.… (more)

This book delivers what it promises: a concise history of the Hittite empire, a somewhat lesser-known early state in the Middle East. The Hittite heartland corresponds to Anatolia, approximately what is now Turkey. And the height of the empire is from about 1700 to about 1200 BCE. It has always been seen as somewhat marginal, in the shadow of Mesopotamia and especially Egypt. This may be due to the military character of their culture or the lack of great art, two aspects that are also evident from this book: it is mainly a summary of campaigns and palace intrigues, although Bryce does his best to also include aspects of the cultural and social life. More in my History account on Goodreads: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/5694604162… (more)

An exploration into the history of the Kingdom of Hattusha according to its own documents.

The author is very familiar with Hittite history and has written extensively on the subject. This work is designed for the layman to get an idea of what the Hittites are all about.

The author describes the rediscovery of the Hittites. He explores early Hittite history. As he begins to explore the age of the Hittite Empire, he also will discuss gender, marriage, family, the court, Hattusa itself, foreign policy, etc.

The author ends abruptly just as the historical data for the Hittites ends abruptly.

Very useful for understanding.… (more)