Kathryn Greene-McCreight
Author of Darkness Is My Only Companion: A Christian Response to Mental Illness
About the Author
Kathryn Greene-McCreight (PhD, Yale University) is associate chaplain at The Episcopal Church at Yale, priest affiliate at Christ Church in New Haven, Connecticut, and a theological writer. She also serves on the board of the Elm City Chapter of NAMI (National Alliance on Mental Illness) and on the show more Patient and Family Advisory Council of Yale-New Haven Psychiatric Hospital. show less
Image credit: Used by permission of Baker Publishing Group, copyright © 2008. All rights to this material are reserved. Materials are not to be distributed to other web locations for retrieval, published(see © info.)
Works by Kathryn Greene-McCreight
Associated Works
Dictionary for Theological Interpretation of the Bible (2005) — Contributor, some editions — 555 copies, 5 reviews
The Blackwell Companion to Christian Ethics (2004) — Contributor, some editions — 169 copies, 1 review
The Ten Commandments: The Reciprocity of Faithfulness (Library of Theological Ethics) (2004) — Contributor — 49 copies
On Moral Medicine: Theological Perspectives in Medical Ethics (2012) — Contributor, some editions — 21 copies, 1 review
Christology, Hermeneutics, and Hebrews: Profiles from the History of Interpretation (2012) — Contributor — 21 copies
Tagged
Common Knowledge
- Other names
- Greene-McCreight, Kathryn Emily
- Birthdate
- 1961
- Gender
- female
- Education
- Wesleyan University (BA|Romance Languages|1983)
Yale University (MDiv|1988, STM|1989, PhD|1994)
Members
Reviews
Lists
Awards
You May Also Like
Associated Authors
Statistics
- Works
- 8
- Also by
- 7
- Members
- 339
- Popularity
- #70,285
- Rating
- 4.1
- Reviews
- 5
- ISBNs
- 12
The Brazos Theological Commentary series tends to want to highlight various theological premises and particular contributions of a given text to our theological understanding. Greene-McCreight did not disappoint in this regard; she well highlighted the various ways in which Paul’s Letter to the Galatians thus contributed to our understanding of Paul’s perspective on theology and on theology in general.
In the epilogue Greene-McCreight grappled with how to best understand the relationship between the church and Israel in light of Galatians. One can tell how constrained she felt by Protestant mixing of covenants and an intense desire to stay as far away as possible from anything resembling supersessionism or “replacement theology”, coming up with the neologism “infrasessionism” to attempt to explain the situation. Her claim no Jewish people were part of the churches of Galatia seems a bit strong for the evidence, and thus her conclusion that Galatians says nothing about how Paul considered the relationship between Jewish Christians and the Law of Moses proves a bit baffling. Paul never declaimed his Judaism; but he did speak of how in Christ there is neither Jewish nor Gentile (Galatians 3:28), considered himself as having died to the Law and crucified with Christ (Galatians 2:20-21), and spoke at length regarding how “we” were under the paidagogos until faith in Christ came, after which the paidagogos no longer had any authority over him.
I understand the concerns regarding the ugly heritage of antisemitism in Christendom and how flippant many who uphold a form of supersessionism/replacement theology can prove. Yet as in all things religious, let alone Christianity, so much distortion and error derives from over-reactions to the bad doctrinal and practical views and actions of others. Yes, Paul did see points of continuity; he asked God to bring peace and mercy on the Israel of God, after all, and considered all who share in Abraham’s faith as children of Abraham. There’s no ground for Marcionism in Galatians. But the problem in Galatia were “Judaizers,” those attempting to impose circumcision and Jewish rituals on Gentile Christians, and those Christians were not to tolerate anything of the sort.
Nevertheless, a good resource while exploring Galatians.… (more)