Folio Archives 322: The Monk by Matthew Lewis 1984

TalkFolio Society Devotees

Join LibraryThing to post.

Folio Archives 322: The Monk by Matthew Lewis 1984

1wcarter
May 11, 2023, 8:28 pm

The Monk by Matthew Lewis 1984

A rollicking story that includes romance, adventure, lust, apostacy, murder, abduction, corruption and devil worship.

What more could you want from a novel? Except this work was first published in 1796 and several blasphemous and risqué sections had to be expunged before it was considered suitable for publication. This edition includes all the censored sections.

The Folio Society edition has xxi + 312 pages and is introduced by Devendra P. Varma. There are ten full-page bound-in wood-engravings by George Tute and it has pale grey endleaves printed in black with a wood-engraving by Tute. The book is quarter bound in black cloth with red, white and black Cockerell marbled paper boards and the page tops are stained red. The black slipcase measures 23.6x14.4cm.

. . . .



















































An index of the other illustrated reviews in the "Folio Archives" series can be viewed here.

2Shadekeep
May 11, 2023, 11:44 pm

That looks fantastic. Love the artwork especially.

Just a side note, Black Letter Press has an edition of this book forthcoming, but much more understated.

https://www.blackletter-press.com/product-page/matthew-gregory-lewis-the-monk

3Cat_of_Ulthar
May 12, 2023, 12:49 pm

I agree with Shadekeep, this does look a lot of fun and the woodcuts are lovely.

4affle
Edited: May 12, 2023, 7:03 pm

Searchers for copies of this should be aware that later impressions - I have the third, 2010 - may have minor variations. Mine does not have the red staining to the page tops, and the paper on the boards is described as 'printed Cockerell marbled paper' rather than 'Cockerell marbled paper' and has rather darker colour mixture. Rather oddly it is described as three-quarter bound, when it is no such thing. Printing is by TJ International on Abbey Wove, rather than Pitmans on East Lancs. I'd say the first impression may be the one to get, but mine was in completely unread condition for just £10, and you can enjoy the woodcuts just as well.

Edited to add that my third impression doesn't have those nice textured endpapers either...

And edited again to report that my copy has the spine title and colophon in roman lettering, not gothic

And a red slipcase, not black

5ultrarightist
May 13, 2023, 11:58 am

Excellent woodblock illustrations. This is the sort of book FS should offer in a limited edition printed letterpress on mouldmade paper, with the illustrations printed directly from the blocks. I find it odd that despite working with may of the best woodcut illustrators over the decades, FS has never (to my knowledge) printed woodcuts from the block.

6mr.philistine
May 13, 2023, 12:46 pm

>5 ultrarightist: ...FS has never (to my knowledge) printed woodcuts from the block.

Would this Limited colour poster commemorating Folio Society's 50th Anniversary count?
https://www.librarything.com/topic/310240#7621234

7ultrarightist
May 13, 2023, 1:22 pm

>6 mr.philistine: Interesting. Yes, it does count, although obviously it's not part of a book. Now that I think about it, some of the limited edition classic poetry series from the late '80s may have woodcuts printed from the block.

8jillmwo
May 13, 2023, 2:54 pm

I think my copy of The Monk may be one of the later printings. I will say that the reading experience was quite thrilling and so enjoyable.

9MobyRichard
May 15, 2023, 12:55 pm

Excellent illustrations but I couldn't make it through the book. Ruined by 20th century shock fiction I'm sure.
I had the Centipede Press edition.

10assemblyman
Nov 21, 5:46 am

I finally acquired this recently and am very pleased with it. I was perusing the prospectuses when it was first released and in both the 1984 and 1985 issues the picture shown of the book shows a more elaborate spine as shown below. I was wondering if this version was ever released or was this just a mock up version that was in the end changed to the one shown in >1 wcarter:.

11wcarter
Edited: Nov 21, 6:34 am

>10 assemblyman:
An internet image search shows no copies with the red label or bands as shown on the spine of the advertised copy.

12assemblyman
Nov 21, 7:30 am

>11 wcarter: I found the same. I thought there may have been an issue with the spine design of the one shown on the prospectus and FS changed it to what we have now. It's strange that they used the same picture in the following years prospectus.

13boldface
Nov 21, 1:07 pm

>10 assemblyman:

Not only does the prospectus spine have red compartments, but there appears to be an elaborate scrollwork design in gilt against the black, which is entirely absent from the book as issued. I think it has to be a mock-up. The page count shown in your illustration is way out as well. The published book has 312 pages + xx preliminaries + 9 (x 2) unnumbered plates, making a total of 350 pages at most, well short of the "416pp approx." as advertised.

Anyhow, I much prefer the more restrained spine, and George Tute's engravings are fantastic in every sense. The frontispiece is reproduced in Folio 60, which, incidentally, describes the book as issued, with no alternative spine design. A lovely book.

14astropi
Edited: Nov 21, 4:20 pm

>1 wcarter: Stunning woodcuts!

>2 Shadekeep: I was disappointed that Black Letter Press is not truly letterpress! I would love a letterpress edition of The Monk. Maybe Suntup will produce one?

15assemblyman
Nov 21, 5:38 pm

>13 boldface: Well spotted. I did not notice the difference in the page count. I am also quite happy with the one released but this other design looks equally appealing to me.