Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... The Immortals (2016)by Jordanna Max Brodsky
Books Read in 2016 (1,232) mom (296) Loading...
Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. No current Talk conversations about this book. The Immortal's starts quickly but it takes a while for to reader to invest themselves in the characters. You know the main character's Athena, as that's part of the synopsis, but when you first meet her she has fallen far from her original glory and this is discordant with how the reader believes Athena should be. Now, this is not necessarily a bad as the plot revolves heavily around the concept of diminishing immortality, but it does make Athena initially less compelling. As the story progress you grow accustomed this new age and how its affects the old gods and you being to embrace this less than divine goddess. The losing strength is a powerful, authentic, and prominent theme it's just not immediately compelling as you are on the wrong side of the loss. Nonetheless, the story moves forward, slowly gathering momentum as you are introduced the second main protagonist, who is immediately compelling, and the the authors slowly doles out bits and pieces of the plot. If you are strictly a quick-paced reader this is not a book for you. I digress through; the story progresses and the characters evolve. You meet other Olympians and are presented with both timely bits of backstory and possible perpetrators. The story continues like this up to its conclusion where it has a nice reveal but a slightly underwhelming climax, which was at once too predictable, too easy and lacked the emotional impact it really needed. On the whole though, I very much enjoyed it. My interest in Greek mythology drew me to this book, and the mystery Brodsky wove kept it going pretty well. The ending could have been wrapped up quicker than it was, once the mystery got close to the end I kept feeling like I wanted the story to go quicker, but the pace was a little too slow for my liking–Brodsky was still adding backstories toward the end, which I felt was unnecessary. Besides some of the extraneous content, the core story was rather interesting. I liked the obvious amount of research that went into Greek history, and the way that Brodsky painted the modern-day gods and goddesses. There was interesting dialogue throughout. I'd give this one 3.75 stars if I could, but a solid 3.5 will do. Goddess Artemis assumes the Selene DiSilva as her name and adopts Manhattan as her home. While walking her dog one morning, the “former” goddess stumbles upon the body of a young woman washed up the shores of a river. The woman’s body is horribly maimed and wreathed in Laurel. Additionally, this victim has all the signs of a ritualistic murder and recognizing the how the crime is of significance, Selene vows to seek justice for the young woman. Her investigations lead her to ally with Dr. Theo Schultz, a professor of mythology & classical studies. no reviews | add a review
Belongs to SeriesOlympus Bound (1) Notable Lists
"A high quality contemporary fantasy novel that will appeal to a wide range of readers from American Gods to the kids who grew up reading Percy Jackson. The Relentless One, the Bearer of the Bow, the Untamed.....those are only a few of the names Selene DiSilva's answered to over the years. But these days she's content to work in secret, defending the women of Manhattan from the evils of men. She's reclusive, stubborn, and deeply unfriendly to everyone but her dog. But when a woman's mutilated body washes up in Riverside Park wearing a laurel wreath, Selene finds that she can no longer hide in the shadows. As more women are threatened, Selene is forced to embrace the one name she's tried hardest to forget -- Artemis. For who better to follow the killer's tangled trail than the Goddess of the Hunt herself?"-- No library descriptions found. |
Current DiscussionsNonePopular covers
Google Books — Loading... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)813.6Literature American literature in English American fiction in English 2000-LC ClassificationRatingAverage:
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
Gods among the mortals isn't a new idea in fantasy, but Brodsky's version is firmly anchored in research. Depending on your wheelhouse, this level of detail can be an attraction or a bore. Personally, despite my long fondness for ancient Greek art and myth, I did find the explanatory babble occasionally cumbersome, although not as bad as I would have expected in an urban fantasy. It works because Theodore Schultz is the ultimate professor, easily expounding on ancient culture and mythology at every opportunity, even in a police station.
Although I am drawn to thoughtful characters, Artemis is no Athena (fun fact: I mistakenly named my rottweiler Athena instead of Artemis. She also was no Athena, metaphorically speaking). Her strategy in solving the mystery is to investigate crime locations and to accuse everyone she knows of the crime. Ordinarily, this headstrong thoughtlessness would irritate, but Brodsky makes it work for her. However, much like the deities in mythology, she also distinctly lacks a sense of humor. As in mythology, Theo is the character that helps the reader connect to the story.
On the downside, the author clearly follows the theory Conservation of Character, which was kind of a disappointment. There were a lot of insignificant mortals in mythology, so I missed the lack of inconsequential players, along with missed potential in minor gods and half-children. Strangely, early on we are introduced to Gabriela, a completely stereotypical Latina chica, her girl-friend speech pattern, her gay-dar, her moods that "could turn on a dime" and physical affection with Theo. I felt kind of embarrassed for Brodsky creating such a stereotypical mess of a character.
Setting was one of the high points: what's not to love about New York City? She even nails the strange stale and fetid smell of the subway in the heat. However, Brodsky chooses to set her story fairly solidly in time, a serious mistake. I was puzzlingly distracted by more than a few mentions of Alexander Hamilton (the person, not the musical), and my reading buddy noted references to Amy Shumer, Anderson Cooper and Saturday Night Live! are going to badly date the books. Seems kind of a rookie mistake, but then it is a first book. So much of NYC is fairly timeless that it is a surprising choice.
Plotting is perhaps one of the weaker points. It roughly revolves around "who killed Helen," Theo's ex-, "and why?" but it does develop a couple of related sub-plots. I will say that I was able to identify the villain fairly quickly, and as I've said before, if I'm able to do that, you are performing the literary equivalent of ALL CAPS! MURDERER HERE! There's a romantic subplot that feels incompletely realized. Basically, why is the virgin goddess falling in love while she's avenging a woman? Goddesses are capricious and all that, but seems a bit hard to conceive that our cold moon goddess is mooning over a man as she's hunting a killer. Brodsky didn't really quite have the chops to pull it off.
It wasn't until the end that I realized one of the philosophical underpinnings of the world-building, the idea that deities can be maintained by adapting to new traditions, was utterly ignored with Persephone, goddess of harvest, and Leto, goddess of motherhood. Somehow the females all became weaker while the males became stronger. Clearly, Brodsky's never worked with a gaggle of moms-to-be, had to buy stupid baby presents every year or look at a facebook feed full of fat little faces. The Cult of Motherhood is strong.
Overall, I'd say I enjoyed reading it, but I do tend to rely heavily on skimming over the boring bits, whatever they may be. The approach seems to be a little more of the literary-fiction angle than the UF angle, which may be why there's a blurb from Deborah Harkness on the front. People who don't groove on Greek myths or on NYC may be more bored, although it's worth noting that Artemis' approach is more like a superhero- powerhouse, not a magicky-wishy--thinky approach. This was generally solid, and more palatable than early Harry Dresden books. I think there's some interesting potential, so while I wouldn't add it to my personal library, I'm also willing to continue the series.
Three-and-a-half stars. Rounding down because the world-building sexism bugged me. ( )