Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... The Eurasian Way of War: Military Practice in Seventh-Century China and Byzantium (Asian States and Empires)by David A. Graff
All Things China (130) Loading...
Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. No current Talk conversations about this book. no reviews | add a review
Belongs to Series
This book is a comparative study of military practice in Sui-Tang China and the Byzantine Empire between approximately 600 and 700 CE. It covers all aspects of the military art from weapons and battlefield tactics to logistics, campaign organization, military institutions, and the grand strategy of empire. Whilst not neglecting the many differences between the Chinese and Byzantines, this book highlights the striking similarities in their organizational structures, tactical deployments and above all their extremely cautious approach to warfare. It shows that, contrary to the conventional wisdom positing a straightforward Western way of war and an "Oriental" approach characterized by evasion and trickery, the specifics of Byzantine military practice in the seventh century differed very little from what was known in Tang China. It argues that these similarities cannot be explained by diffusion or shared cultural influences, which were limited, but instead by the need to deal with common problems and confront common enemies, in particular the nomadic peoples of the Eurasian steppes. Overall, this book provides compelling evidence that pragmatic needs may have more influence than deep cultural imperatives in determining a society's "way of war." No library descriptions found. |
Current DiscussionsNonePopular covers
Google Books — Loading... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)335.009495Social sciences Economics Socialism and related systems Standard subdivisions History, geographic treatment, biography EuropeLC ClassificationRatingAverage: No ratings.Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
On a wider theoretical front, he uses this to argue against the notion of a "Western Way of War" as advocated by Hanson, Keegan, and other military historians, supposedly differentiated from non-Western traditions of war-making in emphasizing face-to-face fighting rather than evasiveness and trickery. Graff finds that Byzantines and Chinese both did plenty of each, and moreover insists that military strategy is much more responsive to conditions and less predetermined by cultural dictates than Hanson would allow.
Interesting and convincing, if decidedly niche.