Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... Tortilla Flat (original 1935; edition 1997)by John Steinbeck (Author)
Work InformationTortilla Flat by John Steinbeck (1935)
Books Read in 2017 (1,690) » 9 more 1930s (65) Books Read in 2022 (4,365) 20th Century Literature (998) Best Friendship Stories (187) SHOULD Read Books! (74) Loading...
Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.
Tortilla Flat is not really a novel, ratrher a collection of short stories about the same characters. As the focus shifts from one to the other character, each is portrayed from different angles. Many of the stories are wrily humourous, and the portrayal of each character is deeply human. Tortilla Flat clearly foreshadows Of mice and man. It is a must-read for readers interested in John Steinbeck. ( ) My first Steinbeck. A gift from a friend with very heavy-drinking parents, now passed; the inscription from his father to his mother is on the flyleaf. I am a drinking men from a long line of them myself. And there is some heavy drinking herein, as a way of life. The prose is wonderful. The stories are episodic without much in the way of overarching narrative. Heavily influenced by the the Grail mythos, which I also happen to be interested in, and am learning of its profound importance to Western culture. But what to make to this? This uses wonderful prose, borrows expertly from a magnificent mythic inheritance, and uses it to describe a bunch of primitive and criminal savages incapable of making anything, building anything, raising a family, or forming any kind of society. They cannot really be said to have an honour code save the honour of a bandit gang. One character does display true morality as kind of a retarded naif, his kindness shows through in his fondness to dogs and religious faith. The others? Pah. It is also laugh out loud funny in places, given the elaborate intellectual structures its protagonists erect to justify their continuing alcoholism. But I can't see the people herein as noble or good. They are humerous grotesques. The book works on that level. It almost, in places, convinces you that you shouldn't judge them and that they are worthy peasant stock. But overall that idea is laughable. If Steinbeck intended them as such he must be well off-kilter - either a nihilist or a moron. Will find out when I read his other books, I suppose. Despite its qualities the book gives the impression of a literary degeneracy. no reviews | add a review
Belongs to Publisher SeriesIs contained inHas the adaptationIs abridged in
Classic Literature.
Fiction.
Literature.
Historical Fiction.
HTML:Adopting the structure and themes of the Arthurian legend, John Steinbeck created a “Camelot” on a shabby hillside above the town of Monterey, California, and peopled it with a colorful band of knights. At the center of the tale is Danny, whose house, like Arthur’s castle, becomes a gathering place for men looking for adventure, camaraderie, and a sense of belonging—men who fiercely resist the corrupting tide of honest toil and civil rectitude. As Nobel Prize winner Steinbeck chronicles their deeds—their multiple lovers, their wonderful brawls, their Rabelaisian wine-drinking—he spins a tale as compelling and ultimately as touched by sorrow as the famous legends of the Round Table, which inspired him. No library descriptions found.
|
Current DiscussionsNonePopular covers
Google Books — Loading... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)813.52Literature American literature in English American fiction in English 1900-1999 1900-1945LC ClassificationRatingAverage:
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |