Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... Book Lovers (edition 2022)by Emily Henry (Author)
Work InformationBook Lovers by Emily Henry Loading...
Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. No current Talk conversations about this book. Despite Emily Henry naming all her books~ Generic Title, basically, and not that I was expecting it to be bad because of that, but I was surprised and impressed how litsy and conscious it is; it seems like a comedic version of Jojo Moyes, you know. (From what I can tell Jojo writes romantic drama. Thatâs certainly what âMe Before Youâ is.) Itâs the kind of book to make you wonder why rad people complain that books theyâve never read â(ie Emily Henry)âare bad Lifetime movies~it opens with contrasting that sort of thing with real life, you know. And you know, sometimes ârealityâ or trashy shows/movies skew a little less obnoxiously unkind/untrue, but we all know, I thinkâdeep down, at leastâwhat real life is, (unless weâre in a locked ward, lol), and what the made-for-TV shame-the-NYC-girl movie you watched with your churchy father when you were eight are, you know. And now, somebody said it. And, of course, the issue of why we still have this unspoken assumption 83% of the time, that an authorâa really, really ~good~ author is supposed to emote likeâfuck, ~he~ is supposed to ~look~ likeâHugh Auden, you know. Because you know that, which ever kind they are, which end of it, that the average guy who would say that heâs not prejudiced or whatever and would maybe talk about prejudice or at least the folksy clichĂŠ about book covers to be corny and folksy, you wouldâhe probably wouldnât need to read five pages before dismissing âEmily Henry!â with infinite importance, you know. (Heâd just need to scan the cover, lol.) Itâs funny. Women are rebels; at least, unless theyâreâŚ. I donât know. Sad. (Sad is one of my favorite words. My friend likes to make fun of me, but I donât use the word âbadâ!) You know, like: the feminine principle is warmth and joy and happiness; and thatâs not what youâre supposed to like. Youâre also not supposed to like girls, really. So to be one of those bubbly girls everyone thinks half (51%) of the population isâŚ. Itâs like your reputation is crusinâ for a bruisinâ, you know. (opens Hugh Auden book and starts reading incredibly insincere lines about Ancient Greek religion) (passes Emily Henry book) (sneers) Emily Henry! ~(who?) Arrest her! (they laugh) âŚ. And the REALLY funny thing is youâre not supposed to take propaganda (dump the NYC girl; raise a family with a family girlâthatâs the true life!) seriously, you know. I mean, you AREâŚ. but only if it makes you want to do something âbadâ, you know. (And Iâm not minimizing the effect of following through the propaganda to the letter on the professional womanâie the speaker in this book.) Imagine your a teenager or whatever, and you love female country pop or whatever, and youâre peeved about female sci-fi movie leads, you knowâand you try to tell your dad about it, you knowâŚ. Slowly, and cautiously, basically: well, theyâre both girlsâŚ. And girls donât matter; not as muchâŚ. Just donât get excited; donât invest anything in itâŚ. Go to church. âŚ. (Re: the first chapter boyfriend) Wealthy people who think that money doesnât matter can be some of the worst peopleâafter all they have a lot, and who doesnât find ingratitude endearing! Not Hermes! He does NOT not find ingratitude endearing, you know! đ¸ (âI know less than half of you as well as I should likeâŚ.â đš). You know: to say, âI am wealthy, sure; and I enjoy the lifestyleâ, would at least take a Little guts, you knowâŚ. People would make fun of youâŚ. Although it would sure be legal! đâbut, just, you knowâŚ. âI am rich, becauseâŚ. Well, the teachings of Marx and Saint Francis and people on the internet have all come together and converted me to their viewpoint. Therefore, Iâll keep all my money.â You know: the total, total, ~total~ mental-emotional laziness, you knowâŚ. âŚ. It is kinda funny how if Elinor were around today, sheâd have a lot more money, and she probably wouldnât get married until she was at least thirtyâŚ. And you know, sheâd still be one half of the epic folk pop duo, âElinor and Marianneâ, rightâŚ. âŚ. Itâs funny how itâs like âThe Hiding Placeâ, albeit without the Nazis or the Romantic Hero Dutch ChristiansâI know that sounds like a lot, but it is kinda the same: the two sisters, the masculine sister, and the feminine sisterâŚ. I also thought it was artfully done, how she draws attention to New York Cityâs charming side, and also the often, kinda neglected-to-grim-and-shitty ârealistic portraitâ face of rural America, you know: without sounding like an internet liberal who makes it sound like everybody in all red states always commits suicide (although maybe not quick enough, right)âŚ. [And later she does portray the âcountryâ heartthrob as someone who will make someone happy: âeasyâ in the good way; easy, without being nervous or quick, rightâŚ. Chill. In an abstract way, surprisingly folk, rightâŚ.] People really could learn a lot, by knowing something about loveâŚ. âŚ. Itâs like you walk into the shop with the sign âLooking for city slicker seeking country getaway and small-town romanceâ, and the sign, âmales onlyâ, and you say, Lemme just, (jiggles), and you just kinda, take the sign down, right. Itâs also kinda funny how when youâre a kid your dad or whoever is like, Son, letâs watch this delightful sexist family romance movie togetherâand by the time youâre like fifteen or whatever, youâre literally never supposed to ever watch any movie like that ever again. (But you want to: thatâs why you have to get married. Although, you donât want to watch it with your ~wife~; sheâs a ~woman~.)âŚ. Itâs like youâd either have to be a femme mystique junkie, or, maybe, you knowâare there adults? Are people allowed to grow up?âŚ. âŚ. Apparently an uncle of mine once committed a great deal of white collar crime/fraud, although to hear my dad tell the story, youâd think that it was the judge who broke The Rules, since she got angry at him: and she was a woman, rightâŚ. For someone who grew up on those Old Hollywood movies, it must have been an easy decision to make, right: a man whoâs related to you versus a woman who isnât, right. âThe only way a stranger, a foreigner to our little society, can even approximate the respect we offer our own family is if they obey gender rules, son.â Although I guess that individual actually isnât my uncle anymore; he was never a blood relative, right. âŚ. They both love books, but I feel like Emily Henry should just title all her books, Ironic Title (No. X), you know. Her thing is like, do do do, Iâm just a stupid little girl, telling a stupid little storyâabout love! Oh, whatâs this? A stereotype? Why, how do youâ (takes out knives and goes into ninja mode and slices up stereotypes/stigma). Right? And the institution of the family is so weird. [The Heritage Foundation: The Last Year of Democracyâ2025~ Talking Point Number One: The FamilyâŚ.]. Some people are so much better at conventional money making activities than home/care stuff, and then people use that personâs work skills while smearing snot over them and saying that they donât love their sister, right. (If theyâre girls, at least.) And then some people want to care for kids, but literally cannot rub two nickels together to do it, you know. The agent girl should be able to have a baby and pay to enroll it in the other girlâs home of like twenty little baby goslings, where she works for 6-8 hours a day, right. The two chicks can still be like sisters even if theyâre not relatedâbecause itâs like, the birth-mother and the care-mother are like sisters, rightâŚ. Itâs just not the whole âfemale labor is freeâ, âfemale success is badâ, âasking questions is not allowedâ, thing, rightâŚ. I mean, parenting is a skill, right; the people who are good at it should be paid to do it wellâŚ. And fucking like, just assuming that people wonât abuse their kids, even though theyâve been abusing themselves for decades, rightâŚ. I donât know. I realize that it canât happen. People donât really believe in our system, but that doesnât mean that change should even be ~permissible as a possibility~, rightâŚ. (MAGA hat cursing all his neighbors in a small town) All you damn crackers are sto0pid, and BawdâŚ. (beat) God bless America!!!â âŚ. ~I canât really say no without seeming difficult, can I. Re: her novel entitled, âFrigidâ đžđš âŚ. Well, I guess thereâs one guy from the South who doesnât like getting drunk and âcountryâ. Heâs probably a classical music madman, rightâŚ. But yeah: thatâs not as distinctly SouthernâŚ. Even on those plantations, the rich ones, that was like England, you know. The South was like the alcoholicâs plantation, and the swampland, basically. (chuckles) I must always sound so offensive, right. But it isâŚ. I donât know: thereâs a cultural spectrum everywhere, right. And the dating app jokes: those were funny. âŚ. I try not to leave Generic Tilt to Authority/Generic Approval reviews, you know: not when I understand or have something to say, rightâŚ. But Emily just, Gets Things Right, you knowâŚ. Maybe if I understood life better, you know, I could, do a little adventure with words, like I normally do, rightâŚ. Like, she makes hoomis look good, you knowâŚ. Like, you know how when people act the wrong way around you, and even if it doesnât materially set you back, it like, offends you, right: You Making Hoomi Look Bad, LadyâŚ. You know, I guess it is kinda: older brother vs prodigal brother, you know: itâs religious, and classic, as much as I hate to give credit to theâŚ. But yeah: sheâs like, the opposite. She makes hoomis look good. Itâs gratifying, you know. And it isnât because she thinks that life is an exotic vacation a New Yorker takes in Italy, you knowâŚ. âŚ. âI thought I wanted to be a writer, but then I realized I like workshopping other peopleâs writing more.â Thatâs great. You know, somehow I always thought, likeâŚ. You know, âreal writers write real booksâ, or somethingâbut I consider my reviewing to be serious writing, you know. I am a writer; itâs worthwhile for me. No one else has ever cared, basically; but itâs been enormously helpful for me, rightâŚ. Itâs like a conversation I have with myself, lol. That makes me sound like, introverted to the point of being, not American, rightâŚ. ~You know, like the fascist code is like: weirdo or American? Itâs like, Ah, weirdo, bro, (clicking sound with mouth), but thanks for asking. Itâs like: there are so many different kinds of writing, you knowâŚ. Like, I donât mean to knock Shakespeare, for exampleâI read it through; it is pretty good, usuallyâbut itâs like, how many other writers did it take to make Shakespeare, The Bard, right? And how many of those guys were ~awful~ writers, you knowâŚ. Like, stilted white men lifted up one of their number, you know, in their mind, in subconscious mind: they were exalting themselves, right. And nobody reads any of that Journal of the American Shakespeare Academy magazine crap, or whatever theyâd call it, right: but they feel like those people are better than they are, so they agree with themâŚ. Except that they donât, since it has no influence on their lives. Zero. They wonât even read Litsy Rom-Com From Shakespeare, by Emily Henry, right. (An upcoming title, Iâm sure.) Like, theyâre sure even That, wouldnât be good enough: and they couldnât bring themselves to do it, anyway: so they just give up. The effect of all that writing, is literally just to crush their spirit, lol. To make them feel like theyâre not good enough. I realize itâs not a book with characters that are reviewers, rightâwhether social media people, or trad typesâbut itâs like, thereâs editorial writing: there are all these secondary sorts of writing, you know. Shakespeare did not just fall from the sky the way that the Bible does in an evangelicalâs dreamscape, right. Somebody actually had to read it, or watch it, maybe, and decide that it was good, and tell other peopleâŚ. Most people in that role are incredibly class-boundâlike class-bound socialists, right; or else literally silver spoon aristocrats, or trying to do that vibeâŚ. Most people in that role are ~incredibly~ nervous about making their own decisions: about making any decisions, right. Their âself esteemâ comes from inflicting their superiority on people who canâtâI guess my housemate Bobâs schizophrenic turn of phrase would be, âpick up and liftâ: although itâs never exactly clear what he means, right, lolâŚ. Like: the critic lives by inflicting their superiority in a way that canât be borne, right: like, aww, you tried to watch a historical political drama to kiss up to me: aww, you didnât realize that the way they filled out that bureaucracy form wasnât historically accurate: it really would have been much more complicatedâŚ. ~Itâs like, bro, Only Bureaucrats know how to fill out forms correctly, you know. I donât know how to fill out government forms that exist today in my own country, in the real fucking world, right. Did it ever occur to you that maybe in order to tell a psychologically relevant story, you have to re-arrange the factual truth. ~(smug) Thatâs why Iâll always get you; youâll never winâŚ. (newspaper) You know, thereâs a lot of ~fascism~ in the world today; Putin is attacking UkraineâŚ. Phipps?âŚ. Phipps!âŚ. PHIPPS!!! (beat) Oh, thatâs right. Heâs not a real person. (goes to make own tea) But yeah: whether youâre into Shakespeare, Oscar Wilde, or Emily Henry: medieval, early modern, or contemporary, in my own, (improved!) chronological sequence, rightâŚ. Like, these things donât fall from the sky, right. First, someone has to decide itâs worth reading, so it doesnât fall out of print: and then someone else has to read it, and decideâŚ. Has to decide itâs a True Image, rightâŚ. Someone has to decide itâs a Mask of God, basically. Or a paper newspaper, to beat flies, servants, and plebs with, right. âYou canât just come in like that. You have to wait outside, and have the butler announce you.â âYou donât have a butler.â âMust you quibble?â âNot if I divorce you! Thatâs what Iâve come to do!â (chuckles) Anyway. âŚ. Like, I KNOW my jokes are funny: I laugh at them, right. You have to re-read everything you type on an iPhone, right: otherwise AI would turn it into fucking piddly-winks, you knowâŚ. âMy dad is sick. We hope heâs going to get better.â âI hope he dies.â â!?!â âDOES! I hope he, DOES, get betterââyou know, fucking AI: just start a nuke war; end this madness of spell checkâŚ. [Restaurant in peace, old friendâŚ.] See, see, I tried to write, âmadnessâ: and I got it wrong, and it decided that I wrote âlenderâsâ, right: like: give up if you have to, but donât fucking, write correct-crap, you knowâŚ. But yeah: and re-reading it is essentially the reason for writing it, you know: you learn what youâve been putting in your head, basicallyâŚ. Itâs hard to explainâŚ. But yeah: the first time, Iâm explaining. The second time, I laugh. A conversation I have with myself. No need to tell my psychiatrist, lolâŚ. Oh, how society has failed our psychiatrists, lolâŚ. Itâs like, we leave them with no safe, useful tool to investigate the health of the emotions, you knowâŚ. I mean, thereâs psychology, thereâs a lot of things, you know; but nobody trusts any of it, right. Trust is un-American, you knowâŚ. And yeah: specialization is such, that psychiatrists donât care about psychology, OMFG, LOLâŚ. HahahahaâŚ. Anyway. But, yeah, I talk to people: theyâre like, Youâre funny. Iâm like: correct. Objectively sound, you know. đ âŚ. I think sheâll end up with the proud, frigid nerd, and not the sunny rural guy, right: but somehow, Iâm happy for her, that she gets toâŚ. Even though I suppose if it happened to me, I wouldnât ask for, you know, an additional friend, myself. (Even though! Additional friend = FRIENDSHIP! đş). (I had it all planned out, too, that if it ever happened like that, that would be my game, right. And thenâŚ. đ¤ˇââď¸.) I canât figure it out; and to be honest, I find this line of thought vaguely frightening, right. Itâs certainly the correct choice sociologically, right: introduce the sunny rural love interest, AFTER disproving made-for-TV movie propaganda, obliviousness to the coarseness of most of contemporary American rural life, the cynicism about New York City, rightâŚ. But also let people know that just because you live far from University City, doesnât mean you have to spend your days equating misogyny with the moon landingsâboth fake!!!âand letâs not even start with the whole church boy church boy, revolution! thing, right. (Zombie Jesus: And His Call To Vengeance! ~a NYT best-sellerâŚ. Though perhaps not entirely because of New York! đ) But yeah: I feel like males have done enough to women, that I can deal with my character getting brushed off with the responsibility/no free time spiel, and then have her, you know, making eyes at a new guy like less than twelve hours later, right. I can deal with that. Wow, and itâs sociologically useful! Sign me up, gender epithets! âŚ. And god, and my character is actually going to be doing a favor for her! In exchange for dating someone else, and doing other made-for-TV agitprop movie stuff, right: date the local, save the businessâŚ. Gosh, we HAD to date the local, right: so! Youâd said youâd give your apartment in NYC to my sister, if I went along with her improbable list of bullshit things, rightâŚ. (makes face) Like, WTF? You went on a date, with someone thatâs not me. You had a good time. Good for you. (incredulous) You want me to likeâŚ. (laughs) give you something worth money, because you did that, likeâŚ. Like, ânoâ, maybeâŚ. Whoo, Iâm sorry, but, yeah. Glad you had a good time, though. (laughs hard, then coughs) Ah, wow. OkâŚ. Wow. But I donât know. I donât know what itâs like for girls, right. I really donât. (shrugsâŚ. smiles) But yeahâŚ. âŚ. And yeah: Iâm not having children to take care of, because I figure if the majoritarians are too apathetic to care about family-ism being as waterproof as the Titanic or whatever, as far as nurturing/supporting children, right: well, thatâs their life, the least I can do is not buy into the system, right. But yeah: if your Perfect Jane Bennet Wife spending time with her sister in another state, actually feels snippy at you, and doesnât want to talkâŚ. Good for her, right. Itâs not like being fucking Jane Bennet ever actually won a girl, any actual goddamn respect, right? (smirks) AhâŚ. We are SO dumm. Da vero, rightâŚ. He said in fake Italian. lol. âŚ. (shrugs) At least she still desires affectations, right. Sheâs a poet, no. Itâs just funnyâŚ. Like, everything that implies ârespectâ, also implies, âat the beck and call ofâ, right. (sighs) I wonder if itâs possible to curseâŚ. The ancestors, right. (smirks) Probably both shadow magic, and, ineffective, you know. âŚ. (her immense desire for affectation) (shrugs) I donât know. I guess that affectation should be enough, right. (closes eyes) I canât explain it, the feelings. âŚ. âThe rules that govern family dynamics are nonsensical, but theyâre also rigid.â Raising the next generation of bureaucrats, right. It would make people blue in the face because itâs true, right. âŚ. (Chapter 20) This Emily girl can writeâŚ. âŚ. âJust because not everyone gets you doesnât mean ~youâre~ wrong.â And again: itâs likeâŚ. Just to speculate, rightâyou know what people are like; it really isnât hard to guess, ironically enoughâhow many people see the cover of an Emily Henry novel, and go, âHuh: girl carries herself lightly; must be an idiotâ, rightâand never even dreams of referring to that trite proverb everyone pretends to respect, while not having the slightest reservation about ignoring it, right: when itâs ideologically convenientâŚ. Although itâs not an ideology, right: itâs a mood; the âgirls arenât smartâ mood; the âno romantic ever really cares for anybody, or has any sense or decency or independenceâ, rightâŚ. Itâs like a prejudice, you know: just like thereâs a prejudice about Nora, the girl with a good job, who likes having a sense of agency at work, rightâŚ. And the rest of the paragraph, a lot of it could be used to touch on the differences between Hollywood/folklore magic, andâŚ. I mean: this isnât a book about any sort of magic, but at least it isnât a lie, right. At least it has that in common with it, right? âŚ. (the âworkaholicâ, âsharkâ, etc) ââŚ. but sheâs happy, and (my sisterâs) happiness has always been my drug of choice.â I really wish that there were film directors like Emily Henry, you know. Even the very few who are female, with a very few notable exceptions, seem to be to be, So, AFRAID, right, (Anne Fletcher = rage bait đ)âŚ. The really ironic thing is that itâs almost like âThe Hiding Placeâ, with the two sisters, one masculine and one feminine: you know, the WWII Dutch Christian chick who wrote the book, you know. Although I want to re-, listen, actually, to THP, again, more critically, because itâs likeâŚ. I mean, Christians: like take that Eric Metaxas guy, (and my father, the conservative, loves EM, and THP: having white Christian heroes who fought Hitler is not a want but a NEED, right: gender doesnât exist for him, only patriarchy; since Corrie ten Boom is alright, on some level, he probably thinks her name is Kyle, right?), he literally wrote a childrenâs book about Donnieâs wall and how great it is: this not a Christian politician who loves Jesus on the weekends, right: this is literally a big-name theorist/theologian, and he thinks there should be a wall to divide one Christian-majority nation from anotherâalmost wants to strangle atheists, and then wants to keep out immigrants less likely to be atheist, right? Itâs like: you expect it from like, the military ideologue who happens to be a fervent Christian (Christ is the Godâs name, right? Awesome! USA! USA!), but itâs a surprising lapse in credible propaganda from the Christian historian who tries to write more scientific-materialist history than the scientific-materialists, right. (Iâm pretty sure the Bonhoeffer book ended like: âAnd then his father turned off the radio.â It was a book about the ~science~ of history: turning the white Christian hero into a conservative hero on the sly was a on the down low thing, almost relying on the default function of white supremacy, right?), but itâs likeâŚ. (a) itâs not supposed to make sense; itâs supposed to be what I like, (b) but there are no Mexicans or non-white-conservative Americans in my church, (EM reasons), therefore, Christianity is aboutâŚ. (And his reasoning MUST be perfect, because he doesnât have a heartâŚ. And it led him to support T-45-34!) But yeah: itâs likeâŚ. You wonder, in retrospect, whether THP was meant to blame the Left for the âills of the 70sâ, or whatever youâre supposed to think: so then you kinda invent ills for the 70sânot the real ones, rightâbased on your retrospectively convenient experiences fighting against the REAL racists: the ~Europe~ ones, right!âŚ. And yet, itâs ironic: you scrape away the race ideology, essentially, and they are very similar sets of sisters, you know. Of course, Corrie and her sister didnât marry, you know. Itâs funny, she knew that the love stories of the Forties or whenever were propaganda: she learned it the hard way, rightâŚ. And yet somehow, I wonder if youâre meant to put the book down and decide that feminism is the greater lie, and then go back to your (virtually all white), 90-95+% male theological library, rightâŚ. But yeah: girls who mock their sisters for being workaholics are by no means guaranteed to be happily married. A lot of delusion can hide in the ultra-feminine sister, out of the pair of sisters, right. Possibility exists for great love and serviceâŚ. And also almost bottomless delusion, right. The âI must be religious because I havenât a heartâ men have historically found that personality to be exceptionally useful furniture, ironicallyâŚ. âŚ. âA good contract isâŚ.â (A Frank Capra movie)? NoâŚ. (A novel written to be dramatized by Anne Fletcher?) NoâŚ. A contract is supposed to be, love made into work, you know. Business as the body of loveâŚ. And it is kinda inescapable, that people hate lawyers and contracts and businesspeople, because they expect that person to hate love: to see love asâŚ. Rape, basically: and then somehow, that becomes some womanâs fault, you know, out of sheer mental-moral collapse, essentiallyâŚ. âŚ. The societal parenting contract is B.S. Some people still think that âeveryone should do itââI do have to admit that my own âfaith and flag conservativeâ father, who Iâm pretty sure was a monk in his last life, isnât one of those people, even when I wasâŚ. Like a pre-Trump era boy band neo-alt-right apolitical neo-natalist, in my fevered delusional imagination, rightâŚ.âbut yeah, realistically, some people canât do it, canât do it well, you know: or, realistically, some people REALIZE they canât do it well in timeâand if everyone had that fear, the parenting contract would have to change, because child abuse: and elder abuse, really, wouldnât be acceptableâŚ. But yeah: I like kids; theyâre cute. I donât try to suppress my desire to admire cuteness. But now when I see a kid in ShopRite, I say, âHello childâ, not, âhello babyâ, without trying toâŚ. I mean, I read one of those life span development biological psychology books, but what do you really learn, even if society didnât judge knowledge, rightâtwo-faced problem, rightâŚ. Yeah: because one day I said âhello babyâ to this little girl, and she didnât take it all that well; I tried toâI donât know what I said exactly, you know, âSorry it landed like that for youâ, whatever I said: ironically that came from anti-racism training, not to lecture people that you would never insult them, right, (even though we know that what happens in those anti-racism trainings, is that you conspire with Jewish zombies and Hitler to stab a white baby through the heart, and then divide up the brains into portions to fry up with a little plantain, and eat, rightâŚ. Thatâs been documented; people like me donât say things unless they can stubbornly insist that itâs a fact: say because of a personality flaw, rightâŚ.), but yeah, it was funny: I actually didnât get a reaction; she didnât yell at me; I just literally got no uptake, like she was afraid of me, rightâŚ. Like I said my dumb thing, and she asked her father, Why did that man call me a baby; Iâm not a baby: and then I tried to make her feedback be heard, and she just looked at me like, Why is this strange man still talking to me, and kept yapping to her father, rightâŚ. Shy = terrified, right. Children do have emotional issues at times, (which are either totally denied, or made intoâŚ. Demonic visages, almost, by parents and adults, based upon the circumstances of the comments, right), but yeahâŚ. Terrified, sometimes, you knowâŚ. Or else just the interaction between a miniature human forest dweller, is basically what they are developmentally, and this feeling that they have six months to get an office job, or theyâll be in prison: the undeclared cradle to prison pipeline theory, rightâŚ. I donât know; people are messed upâŚ. âPeople like to remember childhood as all magic and no responsibilities, but thatâs not really how it is. You have absolutely no control over your environment. It all comes down to the adults in your lifeâŚ.â [People forget that learning to read is difficult when youâre in elementary school, right? Itâs like, your brain is literally smaller: itâs like trying to do an easier task with a simpler computer; it cancels outâŚ.] I remember when I was a boy band freak who thought that I was the boy from âLittle Womenââor one of those damn books; I didnât read much, maybe the odd book of Victorian fairy tales, rightâŚ. Sometimes I would hang out in the childrenâs library, (I can almost bet money that, âmaybe a drug dealerâ was like a main thought, and âmaybe a mentally ill young adultâ was like item number 253 on the list of theories, right), and it was likeâŚ. Books on the HolocaustâŚ. Countries of the World: AustriaâŚ. Girlâs Adventure story #457âŚ. âThe Seizing of the Throne: Struggles with Goblin KingsââŚ. It made me nervous! I was like: Iâm glad they have Andrew Lang here, but maybe they could get rid of this other crap, get Harry Styles to write a book, you know?âŚ. And you know: granted that society doesnât even encourage, let alone require, or really even make possible, for children to be raised by child psychologists, rightâthe Randolph Scott Westerns Club secretary probably thinks theyâre being clever when they point out that ~~child psychologists~~ donât have time to raise their kids, right: therefore, stop trying to understand children, go to a globe, close your eyes, put your finger on a country, and bomb that country! Simple!âŚ. Like, itâs something that requires a more elaborate word than ignorance, rightâŚ. But yeah: child psychologists often probably try to make it so that you canât understand more, even after having read, rightâlet alone the 1,001 other obstaclesâŚ. But yeah: the state doesnât require anyâŚ. Proof, you know, that itâs even likely that you wonât abuse your kids and getting knifed in the back by them when youâre 88, right: like, you donât have to prove that you have skill with children: just a blood relationship, and maybe that youâre not actively addicted to cocaine, (if you donât also have a good lawyer, right)âŚ. (voice over an oil painting of Hitler) People are saying that parenting is about more than blood! Lies! Epithet, epithet, LIES!âŚ. ~(chuckles) But I mean, some things you could even learn by observation, right, but, especially most fathers, and all unusually pro-society-contract people, in general, rightâŚ. Like, did they not realize, after picking their kids up from the library, that there are books about children murdered in war, that you can read there? The response is either to trivialize a childâs ability to know, or else to vilify the epithet press, you knowâŚ. (shakes head) I just canât deal with these people. Theyâre not trying to raise their kids, at least in even POSSIBLY trauma-free or trauma-minimizing way, rightâŚ. Theyâre just trying to avoid criticism. THAT is what societal tyrannyâand WHAT is parental ideology, if not That, right?âtrains people to do. Ok, my childâs welfare, thatâs interestingâŚ. But you know: I have my reputation to think of. And your reputation is the same as your obedience to the collective. And yeah, itâs an individualistic collective, maybe in terms of RESOURCES, right: but, values?âŚ. [The collective is powerless to help you, FAR more often, than it is powerless to punish you, no?] At least in its essential and abstract broad outlines: itâs hard to imagine a worse system; at least, thatâs my take, you know. And the only permissible dissent is not to have childrenâŚ. And sometimes, people even complain about THAT, right?âŚ. âŚ. But yeah: even working at HomeGoods, during my ascetic-unsuited-to-asceticism phase, my inclusive intellectualism to avoid misogyny, I hope, for one who felt himself unsuited to romance, phase, rightâŚ. Mothers would come in with kids, and sometimes a brief insight into child psychology would be revealed, although I guess I thought of it as, I donât know, just human psychology, right: so often the vague, indefinable sense of fear that you get, even in semi-verbal children, rightâŚ. Although mostly, all anyone ever learns is to seem dispassionate and controlled, or failing that, dispirited and bored/ennui, or failing that, filled with petty annoyance, complaint/rule breaking, as circumstances dictateâŚ. Or failing that, legal threats and/or rage, (or illegal threats: depending on what you pay your lawyer, etc., etcâŚ.)âŚ. All to paper over that inexpressible fear ofâŚ. Being on earth with the humans, right. Why are we on earth with the humans, mommy: I donât LIKE itâŚ. âOk, wellâŚ. (says something at random to feign engagement)âŚ.â [And/or calmly disputes something factual, right.] Like, people seriously think that your individual result only reflects you, even though it happens to everyone; and your individual freedom consists inâŚ. Being harangued to compel others, to be compelled, to do as others do, right. (Grandpa from âHey Arnoldâ) âSo whatâs the problem?âŚ.â ~(chuckles) âŚ. And, hey lemme go the full distance and alienate people 150%: when youâre dealing with the sort of 2-year-old forest child, right, with lots of, what we would indeed call transgressive energy, if they werenât such good propaganda props about whatever nation is in question, right: but realistically at that age, not only is it very very difficult to restrain yourself, even from eating crayons, right: but I mean, your sense of self is that small/non-existent: do you really need, specifically, your mother, or your father? Or even a child psychologist, yeah? You should have a trained person caring for you when youâre twelve, and you should be in therapy with biological links to yourself, such as parents. But what do you need caring for you when youâre two, other than basic morality, and a high boiling point: nerves that can bend easily without breaking? Realistically it should just be a very basic, very very young person job, right, taking care of two year olds. (I was up all night taking care of 2 year olds like I was 22! âBut we canât trust young people; theyâre traumatized druggies.â What an interesting crack in the social concrete. How do we address this? âBy invading Uruguay!â) Having overworked middle aged professionals or working class people without a snowballâs chance in hell, occasionally supplemented by their 72-year-old retired parents, rightââthese kids are your blood! You have all the skills necessary to get through this!â LikeâŚ. No, just no, okay. And thatâs not to say that the whole society should be raised as non-Jewish whites, or whatever we all think we are, when we call ourselves American, right, butâŚ. Yeah: there are just so many layers; but people donât even believe that our system works: itâs just that they have no nerves, right; you criticize child care arrangements, the militias start planning bombings on the internet, basically: you know, the patriotic/criminal anti-government militias and everything, rightâŚ. Almost everyone is closer to that, than they are to sitting down and asking, you know, âWhat do you really want for your children?â I want my reputation to stay intact. I want the neighbors not to be able to mock me, so that EYE can mock, THEM! (suddenly standing up, pointing around wildly) âPlease sit down.â âŚ. And yeah: it shouldnât be that the family, is almost the only institution with some sort of cultural choice, in a way, right. The State, the conformist intellectual, the atheist, the scientist, even the ad man, sometimes, at least: itâs like, âOh, I treat each and every person like theyâre an 18th century male aristocratâno matter what they want: as long as thatâs what I want. Iâm as anti-racist as it getsâ according to the New York Times, rightâŚ. So people see that reality: and they decide that only terrorists or whoever question the unchangeability of the family, right. And, as sympathetic as I am to seeing elites and the government as organizers of terror, rightâŚ. (sigh) People donât think things through. Of course, theyâre almost taught not to, right. Even in school: itâs impolite to have your own goddamn opinion, in a place where you sit around thinking thoughts all goddamn day, for fuckâs sake, right?âŚ. (!!) I donât know where to start with it. I think Iâm going to go buy a bag to keep cold foods cold and hot food hot at ShopRite, and then Iâm going to try to challenge my preconceived notion that Joanneâs Girly Crafts & Hobbies, LLC, has nothing to offer me, rightâŚ. âŚ. And you know: there are lot of stories I can tell about life: when I was an Episcopalianâyou know, there are two things true of Episcopalians, or at least that are very common, and I was this type. One is that youâre stuck in your head; the other is that youâre constantly musing about how youâre stuck in your head, right. Like, you donât want to stop being a disembodied cloud: but you think you do, right. You can explain that thatâs what youâve been looking intoâŚ. So yeah: once I floated the ideaâI donât know if this was before or after COVID quarantine: I guess right after; because I always saw Mother Lisa knitting or something in the Zoom meeting during quarantine, so one day I asked her about that, and, well, I first I learned she was crocheting, or somethingâthe Christian church trains its guard dogs very well, right: oh no, I think that verse is in SECOND CorinthiansâŚ. ~ways to evangelize, noâŚ.âbut then, I mean: she didnât outright shoot me down, right, but she got all equivocal, like, in effect: I canât really control these people, you do know that, right; I donât know if the grannies would accept you as a sincere girl, you knowâŚ. I could ask them for you, thoughâŚ. âDonât bother.â âŚ. Romantic comedies are off the hook, right. âCrazy Rich Asiansâ is the same way. Things start out so light, and although you see that youâre living in the world of lies, inside the Moon-sun of illusions, you knowâŚ. You think, (Taylor Swift), âHey isnât this, E-asy!â ~But then, by the end: you laugh! You cry! You, die, basically! đ Hooo. AlrightâŚ. And yeah: I wish there were movies for Emily Henry books. Instead we have movies that are likeâŚ. FuckingâŚ. Like if Mussolini wrote a rom-com, right. I maka you a nica pasta, I taka you to see the opera. I introduce you to the Moderate Wing, of the Italian Fascist PartyâŚ. đ 𤪠âŚ. I donât know what to say about this. Itâs always funny, I thinkâsome people might find it funnyâwhich are the books that reduce me to vague rubber-stamp statements about Mastery and Vision, right. Itâs funny, the ones that normally evoke that, I can usually get much more specific and real-talk about, rightâŚ. âŚ. Marxists donât have a great track record on this, partly because the world is grossly unfair and only the countries that had been looted wanted something different, and partly there is a gender riddle, men want justice and women want love, most stereotypically, and the two things are necessary, one to the other, and yet they militate each against each otherâŚ. But Marx had interesting ideas; they donât sound polite, right: although the other thingâyou could call it âcapitalismâ, but thatâs would be politeness itself, and not what I meanâis hardly polite, either, rightâŚ. But yeah: the material basis of love, rightâŚ. âŚ. Itâs funny, I read that book, but I had no idea that somebody loved HeathcliffâI mean, not really. When I read that book, I wasâŚ. My thoughts werenât lost; I could have ideas that made sense, rightâŚ. But my heart was lostâŚ. âŚ. Itâs funny how itâs less ageist (and less child-abuse-y) than a Frank Capra movie, right. In âWonderful Lifeâ, you live in order to pour the old man down the gutter like break fluid or something, your handsome-but-oh-so-above-the-Jazz-Age face getting all crazed as you explain for the cameraâs benefit that defeating the Old Man is your reason for living (although youâd be happy to let an old man physically beat you up, given the âproperâ circumstances, right)âŚ. ~This girl can WRITE a goddamn novel, you know? âŚ. ââJust tell meâ, she says. âI want to hear ~you~ describe it.ââ Ironically, we live in both an age of social media, where there are few economic barriers, from a certain point of view, on anyone creating writing that could, at least theoretically, reach the public: and an age of Google and fact-checker sneers, which, whatever the benefits they may (sometimes) provide, have also strengthened this Sherlock Holmes notion that people have, that what they need is the facts, âjust the facts, maâamâ, or whateverâthat thereâs no reason to ask your aunt or sister or whoever, what they think, when you can just, âlook upâ, the âFACTSâ, you know? âŚ. ââŚ. one that changed you forever.â âŚ. The flowers of winter. âď¸ đ¸ âŚ. And the working title was, âCity Personâ. Awesome. If only books could have more than one titleâif there was a world where that wouldnât be confusing, right. I could work for a publisher, and my job could be to create 22 titles for every book, rightâŚ. âŚ. (re-reads/typo-edits review) But yeah: I get it; Iâm weirdâŚ. (shrugs, then, sings) âShe wears short skirts; I wear sneakersâsheâs cheer captain, and! Iâm in the bleachers!âŚ.â no reviews | add a review
Is contained inAwardsDistinctionsNotable Lists
Fiction.
Literature.
Romance.
Humor (Fiction.)
HTML:One of my favorite authors.Colleen Hoover An insightful, delightful, instant #1 New York Times bestseller from the author of Beach Read and People We Meet on Vacation. Named a Most Anticipated Book of 2022 by Oprah Daily ? Today ? Parade ? Marie Claire ? Bustle ? PopSugar ? Katie Couric Media ? Book Bub ? SheReads ? Medium ? The Washington Post ? and more! One summer. Two rivals. A plot twist they didn't see coming... Nora Stephens' life is booksshes read them alland she is not that type of heroine. Not the plucky one, not the laidback dream girl, and especially not the sweetheart. In fact, the only people Nora is a heroine for are her clients, for whom she lands enormous deals as a cutthroat literary agent, and her beloved little sister Libby. Which is why she agrees to go to Sunshine Falls, North Carolina for the month of August when Libby begs her for a sisters trip awaywith visions of a small town transformation for Nora, who shes convinced needs to become the heroine in her own story. But instead of picnics in meadows, or run-ins with a handsome country doctor or bulging-forearmed bartender, Nora keeps bumping into Charlie Lastra, a bookish brooding editor from back in the city. It would be a meet-cute if not for the fact that theyve met many times and its never been cute. If Nora knows shes not an ideal heroine, Charlie knows hes nobodys hero, but as they are thrown together again and againin a series of coincidences no editor worth their salt would allowwhat they discover might just unravel the carefully crafted stories theyve written about themselves. No library descriptions found. |
Current DiscussionsNonePopular covers
Google Books — Loading... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)813.6Literature American literature in English American fiction in English 2000-LC ClassificationRatingAverage:
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
My favorite part of Book Lovers was the many excellent book references and book loving quotes. Books are the best, arenât they?
The funny writing in Book Lovers hooked me from the beginning, and I loved the characters and sister relationship. This book gave love to both small towns and big cities, and had a satisfying frenemies-to-lovers type romance. ( )