Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... Memoirs of Hadrian (original 1951; edition 2005)by Marguerite Yourcenar
Work InformationMemoirs of Hadrian by Marguerite Yourcenar (Author) (1951)
» 41 more Historical Fiction (35) Female Author (36) Favourite Books (231) 501 Must-Read Books (156) 1950s (21) Five star books (65) Best LGBT Fiction (56) 1,001 BYMRBYD Concensus (236) Europe (17) Books Read in 2021 (2,806) Books Read in 2010 (84) Books Set in Rome (10) Nifty Fifties (39) Edward Gorey Covers (17) Sad Queer Stories (11) le donne raccontano (40) Loading...
Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.
Mooi geschreven boek met interessante historische ontwikkelingen van een van de “goede” keizers van het Romeinse Rijk, grootvader van Marcus Aurelius. Ook vol mooie gedachtenbespiegelingen van een keizer die soms ook wel wrede dingen deed maar over het algemeen probeerde dat te doen wat goed leek. ( ) Written in epistolary form, Hadrian writes to his adopted grandson Marcus Aurelius. This book begins as an update after Hadrian sees his physician Hermogenes and later develops into the reflection and recollection of his life. This book is beautiful, from beginning to the end, beautiful. From his childhood in Spain, to his army life, to the beginnings of his political life, his ascent to power and career successes, his policies as well as love for art and Greek culture, his finding his love Antinous, loss and the grief he suffers, and later old age and approaching death. This was a wonderful, wonderful reading experience. Of course Hadrian has always been considered a great statesman and was indeed an impressive figure. Some of his policies were meant to help improve the conditions of slaves, women and other marginalized groups in Roman society; he also relatively maintains peace and avoids war, especially compared to his previous predecessor, in the empire. However, he is still determined to maintain the status quo and systems that made his rise to power possible, and keeping the empire and colonies intact, even if it means a war that murdered hundreds of thousands and the destruction it led to as was the case with Jerusalem. Reading the book, it was the writer Marguerite Yourcenar and not Hadrian that was at the back of my mind with every read sentence. She worked to bridge the distance of eighteen centuries that separated her from Hadrian, reconstructing that world that is long vanished save for the histories, ruins and artworks from the period and worked successfully to give a self-portrait of the emperor. She was the one more impressive to me and not the emperor, even though she claims her role was as a sorcerer: "The sorcerer who pricks his thumb before he evokes the shades knows well that they will heed his call only because they lap his blood. He knows, too, or ought to know, that the voices who speak to him are wiser and more worthy of attention than are his own clamorous outcries." This is a project that was a three decade process; reading the writer's reflection on composition, which was part of the library copy I had, was a fascinating reveal into the process that bore this book as well as the research the writer undertook and the bibliography notes provided. How she was able to dissolve history, facts, hypotheses and invention and have it all merge, formed and crystallized into the marvel that is this book, how she did it all, I'm still impressed. This is a remarkable artistic achievement. The photographs illustrated and selected by the writer, along with the reflections on composition and bibliography notes contribute to the wonderful reading experience. The glowing and brilliant reviews the book has received are more than merited. The English translation of the book was also impressive. Reading this at times I forgot that it was a translation, translated from French by Yourcenar's partner Grace Fick who worked in collaboration with the writer and who the writer also acknowledges for her role in the writing of the book (not related to the translating). This was brilliant, it was with a mixture of awe, admiration and envy that I read this. I am disappointed to say that I couldn't read not even 10% of this book that people have been going nuts about. It's a classic masterpiece they say and I can't find it attractive because it doesn't seem like fiction. It's the writing style and the ramblings and musings that I hated from the start. I would have liked it if it were written like an actual fiction story.
'La mayoría de los hombres gusta resumir su vida en una fórmula, a veces jactanciosa o quejumbrosa, casi siempre recriminatoria; el recuerdo les fabrica, complaciente, una existencia explicable y clara. Mi vida tiene contornos menos definidos. Como suele suceder, lo que no fui es quizá lo que más ajustadamente la define: buen soldado pero en modo alguno hombre de guerra; aficionado al arte, pero no ese artista que Nerón creyó ser al morir; capaz de cometer crímenes, pero no abrumado por ellos. Pienso a veces que los grandes hombres se caracterizan precisamente por su posición extrema; su heroísmo está en mantenerse en ella toda la vida. Son nuestros polos o nuestros antípodas'. Belongs to Publisher SeriesIs contained inInspiredHas as a studyAwardsNotable Lists
Both an exploration of character and a reflection on the meaning of history, "Memoirs of Hadrian" has received international acclaim since its first publication in France in 1951. In it, Marguerite Yourcenar reimagines the Emperor Hadrian's arduous boyhood, his triumphs and reversals, and finally, as emperor, his gradual reordering of a war-torn world, writing with the imaginative insight of a great writer of the twentieth century while crafting a prose style as elegant and precise as those of the Latin stylists of Hadrian's own era. No library descriptions found. |
Current DiscussionsNonePopular covers
Google Books — Loading... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)843.912Literature French & related literatures French fiction 1900- 20th Century 1900-1945LC ClassificationRatingAverage:
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |