Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... The Glass Menagerie (original 1945; edition 1999)by Tennessee Williams (Author)
Work InformationThe Glass Menagerie by Tennessee Williams (Author) (1945)
1940s (26) » 22 more 20th Century Literature (262) Favourite Books (478) 100 World Classics (17) Books Read in 2016 (3,021) Plays I Like (10) AP Lit (78) Books Read in 2005 (54) One Book, Many Authors (380) Loading...
Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. No current Talk conversations about this book. جیم: چی بود بهش خوردم؟ لورا: میز بود. جیم: مثل اینکه چیزی از روش افتاد؟ لورا: بله. جیم: خدا کنه اون اسب موچیک یه شاخ نباشه. لورا: چرا خودشه. جیم: ای داد شکست؟ لورا: حالا مثل اسبای دیگهس، دیگه شاخ نداره. جیم: مگه شاخش... لورا: شکست، عیبی نداره، شاید این یه خوشبختی در حین بدبختیه. میشه گفت کل نمایشنامهی باغ وحش شیشهای توی همین چندتا دیالوگ بیان میشه! نمایشنامهی خوبی بود. It was great to revisit this classic play about the fragility and complexity of human relationships. Some interactions are transparent as the glass in the title; others are more subtle. Williams addresses social issues of 1939: mental illness, physical challenges, and social isolation. The stage directions and dialog in the written play depict the menagerie as a vivid symbol for the humans frozen in time, caged in, and feeling helpless in an uncertain society. There is also a prevalent theme of illusion and emphasis on memories being unreliable. See my reviews at https://quipsandquotes.net/ no reviews | add a review
Is contained inIs abridged inHas as a studyHas as a commentary on the textHas as a student's study guide
Amanda, a faded southern belle, abandoned wife, and dominating mother, hopes to match her daughter Laura with an eligible "gentleman caller" while her son Tom supports the family. Laura, lame and painfully shy, evades her mother's schemes and reality by retreating to the make-believe world of her glass animal collection. Tom eventually leaves home to become a writer but is forever haunted by the memory of Laura. No library descriptions found. |
Current DiscussionsNonePopular covers
Google Books — Loading... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)812.54Literature American literature in English American drama in English 20th CenturyLC ClassificationRatingAverage:
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
First of all, if you ever become suicidally depressed, question the value of your life and think about ending it all, then remember that you're probably better off than Laura Wingfield, who unfortunately I cannot refer to as a tragic heroine, since being a heroine, even an anti-heroine, implies having an existential, conquering nature (think Brunnhilde or Medea). Unfortunately Laura is crippled emotionally as well as physically, and seemingly afraid of everything; in today's culture, she would probably be committing cybersuicide. I found myself getting angry at Laura and her obsession with her glass menagerie (a 1940's metaphor for obsessive-compulsive disorder); probably because I'm angry at that fear-ridden part of myself. On the other hand, her brother Tom is either purposely unaware, or being insensitive, in suggesting to Amanda that Jim O'Connor come over to the Wingfield's for dinner so that Laura can meet a man. Because unfortunately Jim ends up being engaged to Betty, and therefore will not be able to whisk Laura away to wedded bliss like a knight in shining armour. Thus, according to Tennessee William's perspective in 1945, men are bastards (this is still true today); Tom, Mrs. Wingfield's absentee husband, and even two-timing (at least as Laura sees it) Jim O'Connor also fit that description.
In the end, Laura is the ultimate victim, Tom is the ultimate bastard, and Amanda ss the ultimate overbearing, nagging yet neglectful mother. And yet, I feel sorry for Amanda for having been abandoned by her "no-good man", as Laura was by Jim O'Connor. Laura is William's first "delicate soul" (the next being Blanche DuBois); given that most homosexuals were closeted in 1940's America, Williams, as a gay man, lived vicariously through these women. His male characters, on the other hand, can be brutes (IE Stanley Kowalski, or the kind of guy Sal Mineo or Pier Paolo Pasolini were interesting in meeting). Even though I may sound flippant in this review, I still find "Das Glasmenagerie" to be authentically, heartbreakingly and bleakly tragic. When Laura blows out the candles at the close of the play, it's as if hope is non-existent and she will remain in that house for the rest of her life. The three characters in this play share a hell similar to those of Sartre's "No Exit". I hope anyone who reads this play will be inspired to transcend their fears and live life to the fullest (I know, easier said than done), lest they end up like Tom, Amanda and Laura. ( )