"I must confess that I lost faith in the sanity of the world"

wow...this was much more twisted than I had originally assumed. Maybe based on the movie, I'm not sure but I definitely had ideas of what this book would be when i started it and it definitely shocked me. ( )

another example of watching the movie is not such a good idea without reading the book first. I remember being totally confused by the movie and not truly understanding what was going on.
The book really details out why he is there, how he got there. It also really shows the rise of the island and the final insanity and collapse.

Such a great book that made you question really, who is the animal and who is the "man" and what really makes man different from animals. ( )

In a period of just a few years, a young writer named H. G. Wells produced four seismic shocks to speculative fiction which reverberate to this day: The Time Machine, The Island of Doctor Moreau, The Invisible Man and The War of the Worlds. Having now read all four of these, I can say that I found only The Island of Doctor Moreau to induce genuine disappointment. While deserving respect for its creativity and its influence, I was underwhelmed by its mystery and the lack of depth in its concept.

In seeking to mitigate this criticism, I initially sought to draw comparisons to Wells' other novels from that burst of late-Victorian creativity. I found Moreau quite staid, but I also thought the same of The War of the Worlds. But the difference, I then told myself, was that The War of the Worlds realised its concept more vividly and with far greater depth. Moreau doesn't really do much to explore the implications of its beast-men, even though the Darwinian fruit is just there waiting to be plucked.

So I said to myself: The Invisible Man didn't mine its concept fully either. That's true, but it did better than Moreau, and furthermore The Invisible Man benefitted from a comic element as its titular character causes havoc in a small English town. The Island of Doctor Moreau has no such thing, and comes across as rather plain even though it is set on a tropical island. Our protagonist does not have much of an adventure, even though all the elements are there: a shipwreck, a mad scientist, a savage tribe of beast-men.

I then found myself measuring Moreau against The Time Machine, and it was found wanting here. The Time Machine was well-realised in both concept and storytelling, and as I made all of these comparisons to Wells' other great titles, I kept reaching a simple conclusion I had been hoping to avoid: namely, that The Island of Doctor Moreau is simply the least of Wells' four most influential novels. As a story, it didn't grab me; its protagonist is non-descript, an Ishmael without a fascinating Ahab to complement him, for Doctor Moreau himself should be far more compelling than he is in this book. The beast-men themselves don't convince, their development shallow as they speak English and live in a rudimentary human-like society, and nor does the Doctor's 'scientific' method of creating them.

And while The Island of Doctor Moreau has a delicious, malevolent undercurrent, a horror element that in many ways is more prominent than the speculative or science-fiction strains, this felt like something else that wasn't fully-realised. "Every shadow became something more than a shadow… Invisible things seemed watching me," our protagonist narrates on page 53, and while we feel this discomfort I wish there more to show for it in the results. As it is, Wells made a sizeable footprint in The Island of Doctor Moreau, but of his four giant strides in that three-year period, this is the one more to be respected than adored. ( )

Such a gripping book with a bit of a disheartening ending. I fear watching the movie would ruin this novel for me ( )

2/5

Well, this was an interesting, classical read. The world that H.G. Wells creates is fascinating and terrifying to imagine. The characters he creates, both man and beast, are amazing and fun to read.

HOWEVER… his writing style is infuriating. I fully acknowledge this is a period piece, but how many times can one use the word “forthwith” before you recognize your absurdity? Really felt like he had a thesaurus near him and just was replacing words for more complex ones at times.

Overall, solid book. I get why this has lasted. But I really hope I can find an author that “re-imagines” this to something a little more bearable to read. ( )