Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... Dreamcatcher (2001)by Stephen King
Eerie eTales (44) » 11 more Best Friendship Stories (148) Books Read in 2014 (1,914) Books Read in 2001 (37) To Read - Horror (58) Sinister AudioTales (56) Fiction For Men (107) Unread books (550) Loading...
Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.
3/5 This book is somewhat notorious among King's work for being two things: weirder than normal and way too long. Even though I enjoyed it, both of these assumptions are almost completely correct. It's a book about an alien invasion, an unusual group of friends and... disregard of human rights by the US military? Yeah, that's about it. The first two are the best parts of the book: King is good at writing the supernatural, even if we're talking about aliens, and the same goes for weird friend groups in shitty situations. The problem comes from... the rest. It's an interesting book, but I wouldn't recommend it to anyone that isn't extremely familiar with King's other works, specially because there are a lot of other, better, books that could fit that space. This novel is just a hot freaking mess. It's hot garbage. It's a dumpster fire. The first time I read this, I remember being not overly impressed, but I didn't actually hate the thing. This time around, I was ready to just stop at least five times...in five days. Through the entire miserable experience, I kept wondering if this was a trunk novel he'd had kicking around during his drug-addled days. After I finished I found out he wrote it longhand while recovering from the accident. My problems are many with this novel, but there's a couple of overriding elements that just ruined this experience for me. The first is, King can't really write SF. He obviously loves the genre, and it's obvious that he tries to bring a human element into it. He tried it with TOMMYKNOCKERS and he'll give passing nods to it down the road in UNDER THE DOME and a little less in THE INSTITUTE. But, at least for me, while it always starts out really promising, it never works out. The second reason—again, just for me—that it doesn't work out, and why this book is so much of a dumpster fire is because of all the "in the head" stuff that King slathers into this novel. We're in Henry's head. We're in Jonesy's head. We're in Mr. Gray's head. There's rooms in there. And boxes. And fax machines. And it, to me, comes across as really amateurish and boring. There's other stuff. The chase scene that runs about a third of the novel. Even the set up that runs a third of the novel before the military shows up. Kurtz is easily one of the worst characters King's ever dreamed up. And yet... There's smaller, far less important (and often completely unneeded) scenes, mostly centred around the four guys and Duddits when they were young that hinted at the incredible writer King can be. This, at times, felt like a twisted IT pastiche, and I also (once again, personal opinion) feel that, had King done alternating young group/older group chapters, it would have been a better paced novel. It's absolutely not the worst book that has Stephen King's name on it (that is, and always will be the toilet paper replacement GWENDY'S FINAL TASK) however, I'd always considered King's other SF travesty TOMMYKNOCKERS as his worst solo novel. I've reconsidered that. It's now only second worst. This one now sits comfortably in that spot. This is my second time reading this novel. I read this right after I read IT when I was a sophmore in highschool and I liked this so much more in my 30s.. This novel starts out slow, and at first is written in present tense making it difficult to read and follow. However, after the first chapter it really picks up and becomes an entertaining story that kept me reading to the very end. I love Stephen King I have made it my mission to read more of his books this year and I am really glad I decided to reread this again this year. I am always drawn to his stories that have that friendship connection, it makes it more readable and I tend to finish them much quicker.
Der Fluss der Zeit geht durch diese Bücher, und man spürt, wie seine Strömung die einzelnen Identitäten auflösen muss. Der Roman ist mit dem Waterman-Patronen-Füller geschrieben, schon dadurch hat er eine starke Beziehung zum Flüssigen - "das hat mich der Sprache so nahe gebracht, wie ich es seit Jahren nicht mehr war. Eines Nachts, während eines Stromausfalls, habe ich sogar bei Kerzenlicht geschrieben." King leiht allen andern seine Stimme, so radikal, dass er als Autor fast verschwindet, wie Joyce und Proust, Céline und Faulkner. Bei keinem anderen modernen Autor hat man so intensiv das Gefühl, dass Amerika ein Land der Transzendenz ist: Wir sind die andern, die andern sind wir. Das ganze Land spricht in diesem Buch, ein unaufhörlicher, überpersönlicher "stream of consciousness". Wir sind "an eine Stromleitung angeschlossen, die statt Elektrizität Stimmen führt." Has the adaptationDistinctions
Four men who reunite every year during hunting season in the woods of Maine, encounter a disoriented, incoherent stranger who drags the men into a terrifying struggle with a creature from another world, and their only chance for survival lies in their shared past. No library descriptions found.
|
Current DiscussionsNonePopular covers
Google Books — Loading... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)813.54Literature American literature in English American fiction in English 1900-1999 1945-1999LC ClassificationRatingAverage:
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
If you are new to Stephen King, don't read this one first. ( )