Kejsare och generaler beskriver de femton främsta romerska härförarna, deras egenskaper, deras slag och deras segrar. Många av dem är kända än i dag: Pompejus den romerske Alexander den store som var minst lika framgångsrik i politik som i krigföring och den aggressive och karismatiske Julius Caesar, som ledde sina arméer till otaliga vinster.

Här beskrivs även några mindre kända krigsherrar; Aemilius Paullus, Makedoniens erövrare och Sertorius som byggde upp ett välde i Spanien och som mördades av Pompejus.

Boken skildrar också den romerska krigföringen, de bittra striderna om Karthago, krigen mot den framgångsrika Hannibal på 200-talet och det sista, desperata försöket att vinna tillbaka västra delen av kejsardömet på 500-talet.

Mr. Goldsworthy is the best modern author as regards ancient Roman history. His work on Julius Caesar is the definitive biography- wonderfully written and comprehensively researched. In the Name of Rome is also an excellent work covering various generals throughout the Republic and Imperial eras. Each chapter discusses a different leader by presenting background information for context and details of a particular campaign. Once again, the author's writing style is very readable. ( )

In the Name of Rome: The Men Who Won the Roman Empire takes us through the Roman Republic and Empire, introducing generals and commanders that left a mark on history. From Cincinnatus saving the early Republic, to why Pompey earned the sobriquet "The Great" even though he was the celebrated loser of a civil war against Julius Caesar, to Germanicus, Trajan, Hadrian and other champions of the empire, Roman historian Adrian Goldsworthy hits most of them in this sweeping narrative. My only complaint is that some of these commanders led such extraordinary careers as to be the subjects of many books just on themselves -- this overview is necessarily brief and having read more detailed biographies on many of these generals, seems a little incomplete. But this is an enjoyable read for anyone with casual interest on the subject. ( )

In this volume Goldsworthy reviews the successful Roman generals that led to the Empire. Without clear guidance and training, Roman leaders were on their own and accumulated military expertise by first-hand observation and often no more than common sense. What Goldsworthy points out though is how the successful generals developed appropriate strategy and tactics for their particular situation. Fabius may appears tentative and hesitant but confronted with a superior Carthaginian army, not to mention a first-rate general, Fabius correctly concluded the best thing a Roman army should do, despite opposition from his own ranks, was to delay and harass Hannibal.

He surveys fifteen subjects--Fabius, Marcellus, Scipio Africanus, Aemillius Paullus, Scipio Aemilianus, Caius Marius, Sertorius, Pompey the Great, Caesar, Germanicus, Corbulo, Titus, Trajan, Julian, and Belisarius--with very little peace both in peace and in war, most of them met with violent opposition or death. Goldsworthy proffers that Roman generalship has much to teach us in that large, deadly Western armies are confronted with weaker opponents practicing asymmetrical warfare.

Goldsworthy's book is informative, entertaining, comprehensive and thoroughly researched - it's a shame I can't think of many people who would enjoy it.

In 16 chapters he covers Roman Generals from Fabius to the fall of Rome in the east, and finds plenty of space to outline the major political and social changes, as well as detailed descriptions of the major battles and campaigns, all referenced with discussions of the various sources, where appropriate. It's a concise summary of what I imagine must represent years of scholarship.

The middle chapters, probably the most familiar to the general audience (and the reason I bought the book) cover Marius, Pompey and Caesar, but I was particularly taken with one of the later chapters covering Trajan's conquest of Dacia, which used descriptions of the inscriptions on Trajan's column in Rome. Goldsworthy does a great job of piecing together a readable narrative from what we can reconstruct, whilst at the same time maintaining an academic tone and not degenerating into speculative storytelling.

The breadth of material covered means the reader sometimes has to work a little hard to keep up. New names of legions, notable figures, and places were introduced often enough that I found myself keeping google open while I read. Goldworthy's determination to cover all relevant material 30 page chapters makes me wonder whether someone new to the subject matter would enjoy reading it, or whether too much information is presented, too quickly.

Goldsworthy makes clear in the introduction that he didn't intend a general recipe book for military success, even less so a guide for those seeking a Roman road to leadership quality. It's a little too broad in approach to appeal to those seeking academic insights. For people like me, who have a rusty memory of a university course taken years ago, it's perfect. I just hope there are enough people who fit into this category to make sure Goldsworthy's books continue to be a commercial success. ( )