Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... Salem's Lot (1975)by Stephen King
Must-Read Maine (5) » 61 more Favourite Books (146) 20th Century Literature (271) Unread books (177) 1970s (54) Eerie eTales (6) New England Books (16) Books Read in 2013 (230) Strange Towns (3) Books Read in 2024 (2,449) KING of Scare (3) 1970s Horror (2) Books Read in 2015 (2,339) Books Read in 2023 (3,346) One Book, Many Authors (277) Books Set in Maine (21) Thrillers (4) Maine (1) Books Read in 2002 (31) To Read - Horror (47) Uni (4) Dark Tower Books (22) Read in 1999 (9) Jarett's Books (44) Books tagged unread (19) Best Fantasy Novels (751) Loading...
Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.
one of my favorite books of all time and hands down the best vampire book ever! Twilight reads read this and see what vampires are about. ( ) A good classic vampire story but the pacing was VERY slow and there were too many long paragraphs. The rhythm of the story did not start to flow until around page 200. Also, there were way too many characters (I lost count on how many). I admire King’s thoroughness in defining each character’s history and background, but I think it was unnecessary since not every character is essential to the plot. A brief background for each non-key character should’ve been substantial. That would’ve saved 200 pages in the book. Overall, I still consider it to be a good classic horror novel. It was not as creepy or scary as it’s been popularly publicized, but it should still be included in the list of novels that everyone should read at least once in their lifetime. I've had over a month to digest this and I have to say...I L O V E D it. I initially gave it a 3.5 star rating, but various parts of this book have stayed with me this long, and I think that makes it earn a 5 star. The elements of the small town make you feel nice and cozy until things don't feel so nice and cozy anymore. This is the longest King book I've read, but I think it ties Dolores Claiborne as my favorite so far. I feel as though I’m a bit of an anomaly because a lot of people have described Salem’s lot as an extremely tense and gripping thriller. They also make mention of the fact that there is a open “”I feel as though I’m a bit of an anomaly because a lot of people have described Salem‘s lot as a extremely tense and gripping thriller. They also make mention of the fact that there is an open “slow burn“ “. However, I don’t particularly feel that. I think that there are better vampire novels and indeed I think that king has written better. it is one of those things where he’s early work starts with promise, in particular, the feeling of creeping dread and expectation, but then degenerates into a body horror schlock fest. The ending was less than satisfactory and I’m not sure that he fully completed his characterisation arts. I certainly think this is worth reading however I don’t think this is King’s best work and there is a marked difference from this, some of his earlier material, and what comes later Belongs to Publisher SeriesCasino grøsser (70) dtv phantastica (1877) Heyne Allgemeine Reihe (8513) Pocket (1831) Is contained inContainsHas the adaptationIs abridged inWas inspired byHas as a student's study guideAwardsNotable Lists
Stephen King's second novel, Salem's Lot, is the story of a mundane town under siege from the forces of darkness. Considered one of the most terrifying vampire novels ever written, it cunningly probes the shadows of the human heart, and the insular evils of small-town America. No library descriptions found.
|
Current DiscussionsNonePopular covers
Google Books — Loading... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)813.54Literature American literature in English American fiction in English 1900-1999 1945-1999LC ClassificationRatingAverage:
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |