Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Nov 19;5(4):53.
doi: 10.3390/ncrna5040053.

MiR-205 Dysregulations in Breast Cancer: The Complexity and Opportunities

Affiliations
Review

MiR-205 Dysregulations in Breast Cancer: The Complexity and Opportunities

Yajuan Xiao et al. Noncoding RNA. .

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenous non-coding small RNAs that downregulate _target gene expression by imperfect base-pairing with the 3' untranslated regions (3'UTRs) of _target gene mRNAs. MiRNAs play important roles in regulating cancer cell proliferation, stemness maintenance, tumorigenesis, cancer metastasis, and cancer therapeutic resistance. While studies have shown that dysregulation of miRNA-205-5p (miR-205) expression is controversial in different types of human cancers, it is generally observed that miR-205-5p expression level is downregulated in breast cancer and that miR-205-5p exhibits a tumor suppressive function in breast cancer. This review focuses on the role of miR-205-5p dysregulation in different subtypes of breast cancer, with discussions on the effects of miR-205-5p on breast cancer cell proliferation, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), metastasis, stemness and therapy-resistance, as well as genetic and epigenetic mechanisms that regulate miR-205-5p expression in breast cancer. In addition, the potential diagnostic and therapeutic value of miR-205-5p in breast cancer is also discussed. A comprehensive list of validated miR-205-5p direct _targets is presented. It is concluded that miR-205-5p is an important tumor suppressive miRNA capable of inhibiting the growth and metastasis of human breast cancer, especially triple negative breast cancer. MiR-205-5p might be both a potential diagnostic biomarker and a therapeutic _target for metastatic breast cancer.

Keywords: Her2+ breast cancer; breast cancer; luminal A/B breast cancer; metastatic breast cancer; miR-205-5p (miR-205); triple negative breast cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The miR-205 location on chromosome and sequence. MiR-205 locates on human chromosome 1q32.2. The seed sequences of miR-205-5p and miR-205-3p are underlined. The miR-205 discussed in this review refers to miR-205-5p.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The distinct roles of miR-205-5p in different types of cancers. Red arrows represent the facilitating effects of miR-205-5p and blue arrows represent the suppressive effects of miR-205-5p. The graph shows opposite roles of miR-205-5p in tumor proliferation, epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), and metastasis among different types of cancers. MiR-205-5p exerts promoting effects in cancers listed in red boxes and exerts suppressive effects in cancers listed in blue boxes.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Differential expression levels of miR-205 among breast cancer subtypes. The expression of miR-205-5p is lower in HER2+ than luminal A/B, and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) has the lowest miR-205-5p level compared with the other subtypes. Decreasing miR-205-5p expression level is associated with enhanced metastatic capability and worsening of patient survival.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A summary of miR-205-5p expression regulation and direct _targets of miR-205-5p and their biological effects. Overexpression of ERBB2 promotes methylation of the miR-205-5p promoter via the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway which upregulates DNMTs, which finally results in miR-205-5p downregulation. TP53 and HES also inhibit miR-205-5p expression. MiR-205-5p _targets different genes directly to regulate cell proliferation, tumor metastasis, stemness, and therapeutic resistance.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ferlay J., Shin H.R., Bray F., Forman D., Mathers C., Parkin D.M. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int. J. Cancer. 2010;127:2893–2917. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25516. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vuong D., Simpson P.T., Green B., Cummings M.C., Lakhani S.R. Molecular classification of breast cancer. Virchows Arch. 2014;465:1–14. doi: 10.1007/s00428-014-1593-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bandyopadhyay S., Bluth M.H., Ali-Fehmi R. Breast Carcinoma: Updates in Molecular Profiling 2018. Clin. Lab. Med. 2018;38:401–420. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2018.02.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen L., Linden H.M., Anderson B.O., Li C.I. Trends in 5-year survival rates among breast cancer patients by hormone receptor status and stage. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2014;147:609–616. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-3112-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fitzmaurice C., Akinyemiju T.F., Al Lami F.H., Alam T., Alizadeh-Navaei R., Allen C., Alsharif U., Alvis-Guzman N., Amini E., Anderson B.O., et al. Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for 29 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2016: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:1553–1568. - PMC - PubMed
  NODES
twitter 2