Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
Page | User talk:Fritzpoll (Log · Page History) |
User | Abd (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
Total edits | 59 |
Minor edits | 4 (6.8%) |
(Semi-)automated edits | 1 (1.7%) |
Reverted edits | 0 (0%) |
atbe1 | 9.5 |
Added (bytes)2 | 113,911 |
Deleted (bytes) | 0 |
Minor edits
·
4 (6.8%)
Major edits
·
55 (93.2%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
1 (1.7%)
Manual edits
·
58 (98.3%)
Reverted edits
·
0 (0%)
Unreverted edits
·
59 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
---|---|---|---|
2010-02-19 02:41 | Diff · History | 212 | →We'll miss you.: Yes, I will. |
2009-12-19 04:51 | Diff · History | 193 | →Congratulations: Yes. |
2009-06-16 19:07 | Diff · History | 596 | →Re self-reverted ban violations.: apparently Minky forgot what he wrote. |
2009-06-16 19:03 | Diff · History | 938 | →Re self-reverted ban violations.: I raised the issue here not as a defense, I would not have made those edits if I'd anticipated the response. |
2009-06-16 18:58 | Diff · History | 3,055 | →Re self-reverted ban violations.: also, I wasn't topic banned and I have very good reason to be looking at the article. |
2009-06-16 18:36 | Diff · History | 1,943 | →Re self-reverted ban violations.: sheesh. |
2009-06-16 17:46 | Diff · History | 3,685 | →Re self-reverted ban violations.: new section |
2009-06-11 00:24 | Diff · History | 2,019 | →What's your opinion?: about the Rothwell ban/block. |
2009-06-10 14:51 | Diff · History | 9,039 | →What's your opinion?: where this has gone and where it is going. For fixing the boiler, $10. For knowing where to tap, $90. |
2009-06-10 03:47 | Diff · History | 716 | →Your comment at Abd's talk: DGAF |
2009-06-09 15:09 | Diff · History | 1,841 | →Your comment at Abd's talk: thanks, Fritzpoll. Make it clear that I believe no admin can unilaterally reverse WMC"s ban. |
2009-06-09 14:11 | Diff · History | 14,443 | →Your comment at Abd's talk: this becomes a suggestion, which might be repeated in a few places, that someone mediate the situation between me and WMC. |
2009-06-08 23:45 | Diff · History | 3,146 | →Your comment at Abd's talk: on brevity, a post of medium length, if not the soul of wit, then perhaps a dream of it. |
2009-04-19 21:25 | Diff · History | 165 | →Please restore User talk:JedRothwell: thanks, Fritzpoll, I'll ask the bot operator. |
2009-04-19 16:39 | Diff · History | 213 | →Please restore User talk:JedRothwell: actually, wikitext isn't enough at all. |
2009-04-19 16:35 | Diff · History | 803 | →Please restore User talk:JedRothwell: sorry, clarify one point and I presume we are done, thanks for considering this. |
2009-04-19 16:30 | Diff · History | 831 | →Please restore User talk:JedRothwell: answer question raised, thanks for considering the matter, sorry to bother you. |
2009-04-19 04:10 | Diff · History | 2,260 | →Please restore User talk:JedRothwell: history and reason for request |
2009-04-18 17:12 | Diff · History | 246 | →Please restore User talk:JedRothwell: new section |
2009-04-18 17:06 | Diff · History | 506 | →Barnstar: great work, Fritzpoll. |
2009-04-08 17:57 | Diff · History | 454 | →Your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: Thanks, Fritzpoll |
2009-04-08 01:00 | Diff · History | 1,851 | →Your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: Thanks, Fritzpoll |
2009-04-05 16:05 | Diff · History | 257 | →Your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: Thanks, Fritzpoll, and clarify one point. |
2009-04-05 03:13 | Diff · History | 14,912 | →Your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: new section |
2009-04-05 01:41 | Diff · History | 466 | Reverted edits by 66.253.210.220 (talk) to last version by Tiamut |
2009-04-01 15:48 | Diff · History | 200 | →Request for userification of Cold fusion controversy: Thanks. Was there a Talk page attached? |
2009-04-01 15:32 | Diff · History | 711 | →Request for userification of Cold fusion controversy: new section |
2009-03-18 22:46 | Diff · History | 1,878 | →Restoration of Yvonne Bradley: here is why not right away. |
2009-03-18 18:14 | Diff · History | 557 | →Restoration of Yvonne Bradley: not quite ready for prime time. |
2009-03-18 01:46 | Diff · History | 81 | →Deletion of Talk:Yvonne Bradley: |
2009-03-17 22:17 | Diff · History | 876 | →Deletion of Talk:Yvonne Bradley: new section |
2009-03-17 22:01 | Diff · History | 1,054 | →Closure of the Yvonne Bradley DRV as endorsed without prejudice.: new section |
2009-03-15 02:36 | Diff · History | 2,724 | →The current MfD for the page that Yvonne Bradley became: Calls for your blood? Thicken thy skin, admin! |
2009-03-14 22:25 | Diff · History | 1,246 | →The current MfD for the page that Yvonne Bradley became: actually, there could be a very simple solution, if you are prepared to take the step. Your call, of course. |
2009-03-14 21:45 | Diff · History | 2,554 | →The current MfD for the page that Yvonne Bradley became: new section |
2009-01-28 00:46 | Diff · History | 164 | →are you allowed to delete people's comments to avoid responding to criticism?: Flagged Revisions? that's important! |
2009-01-26 14:25 | Diff · History | 571 | →are you allowed to delete people's comments to avoid responding to criticism?: Yes, it was me. |
2008-09-16 13:28 | Diff · History | 119 | →Request for rollback.: new section |
2008-09-09 14:33 | Diff · History | 179 | →Section break (edit conflicted with Abd): you are correct, Fritzpoll, sorry for the fuss. |
2008-09-09 14:22 | Diff · History | 12 | →Section break (edit conflicted with Abd): fix link |
2008-09-09 14:21 | Diff · History | 1,782 | →Section break (edit conflicted with Abd): responses |
2008-09-09 11:32 | Diff · History | 2,224 | →User:Minkythecat: sorry for the length of all this, I thought it would be fairly simple. |
2008-09-09 01:48 | Diff · History | 6,563 | →User:Minkythecat: responses to Minky, and some history. |
2008-09-08 20:44 | Diff · History | 180 | →User:Minkythecat: No problem, we'll survive. Thanks. |
2008-09-08 20:09 | Diff · History | 318 | →User:Minkythecat: maybe not urgent |
2008-09-08 19:53 | Diff · History | 1,506 | →User:Minkythecat: new section |
2008-08-22 12:46 | Diff · History | 512 | →Request for participation in User:Abd/RfC: Thanks, Fritzpoll, for considering it. |
2008-08-22 02:37 | Diff · History | 2,102 | →Request for participation in User:Abd/RfC: new section |
2008-08-19 18:12 | Diff · History | 1,687 | →Thanks: yes, thanks. |
2008-08-11 15:57 | Diff · History | 0 | →Something I don't understand: your withdrawal: format |
2008-08-11 15:56 | Diff · History | 2,634 | →Something I don't understand: your withdrawal: new section |
2008-08-06 17:24 | Diff · History | 3,453 | →About the topic ban of Wilhelmina Will from DYK: thanks again for providing me with the evidence. I.e., none. No copyvio evidence was provided at AN/I as cited. |
2008-08-06 16:37 | Diff · History | 71 | →About the topic ban of Wilhelmina Will from DYK: I'm still waiting for specifics on copyvio, but I do intend to search. I shouldn't have to search. |
2008-08-06 16:35 | Diff · History | 2,096 | fundamental error being made in how Wikipedia editorial process is understood. Editors aren't our employees, to be sanctioned for making mistakes. |
2008-08-06 13:16 | Diff · History | 1,206 | →About the topic ban of Wilhelmina Will from DYK: thanks for looking into it. |
2008-08-06 12:49 | Diff · History | 2,411 | →About the topic ban of Wilhelmina Will from DYK: thanks. Please document copyvio problem or unban. |
2008-08-05 21:05 | Diff · History | 1 | →About the topic ban of Wilhelmina Will from DYK: fix link |
2008-08-05 21:05 | Diff · History | 5,178 | →About the topic ban of Wilhelmina Will from DYK: new section |
2008-08-04 17:18 | Diff · History | 2,271 | →Resolution of Wilhelmina Will: thanks for your continued participation in the WW affair. |
All times are in UTC.