Back Ao192Turkish invasion of Cyprus • en.wikipedia.org

Top edits to an page All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Page Turkish invasion of Cyprus (Log · Page History)
User Ao192 (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 29
Minor edits 3 (10.3%)
(Semi-)automated edits 7 (24.1%)
Reverted edits 22 (75.9%)
atbe1 13.7
Added (bytes)2 499
Deleted (bytes) -6
Minor edits · 3 (10.3%)
Major edits · 26 (89.7%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 7 (24.1%)
Manual edits · 22 (75.9%)
Reverted edits · 22 (75.9%)
Unreverted edits · 7 (24.1%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
Diff · History 66 (reverted)  i dont know how that is even disruptive, read the source for yourself. It is literally a claim, even the author says its a claim and writes it as a claim in literally the start of the article. Its a claim, im not removing the claim but rather adding the fact its a claim.
Diff · History 12 Against Greek Cypriots:
Diff · History -12 (reverted)  Against Greek Cypriots:
Diff · History 66 (reverted)  Against Greek Cypriots: Nothing is proven, its just a claim by a random woman from the island who talked to a journalist. theres a chance she was upright lying because there is simply no evidence, but better to keep it a claim. she also claims EOKA-B members conducted in massrapes, but i dont know why that wasnt included in crimes commited by the greek side.
Diff · History -501 (reverted)  Im staying NPOV, "Erickson & Uyar 2020" uses "Jan Asmussen, Cyprus at War: Diplomacy and Conflict during the 1974 Crisis (London: I. B. Tauris, 2008), 274–77." as their own reference. However the book "Cyprus at War" doesnt mention anything about greek military deaths. So, "Erickson & Uyar 2020" is a lackluster and not a very good source to use for casualties. And were left with just one casualty source that has greek military deaths and that is a pro-greek, greek government ran website.
Diff · History -501 (reverted)  Undid revision 1187686380 by John B123 (talk) Theres like 1 billion talk pages id really love it if you linked the direct talk page about the casualties. I just debunked the sources used by pro-greek editors just below, if you still dont wanna believe..
Diff · History -501 (reverted)  "For Greek figures, see Jan Asmussen, Cyprus at War: Diplomacy and Conflict during the 1974 Crisis (London: I. B. Tauris, 2008), 274–77." Erickson & Uyar 2020 This is the reference they have used in order to make the casualties section. If you actually open and read the book "Cyprus at War" (Which i can send you a PDF if you want.), it only mentions about numbers of missing people, not greek or cypriot military death. Check your sources properly next time.
Diff · History 14 Undid revision 1186505289 by Beshogur (talk) Please check other wikipedia articles. Government ran sources must be said (claim) in paranthesis.
Diff · History 14 (reverted)  I dont wanna debate this further, sources are from the greek ministry and the greek government, it is required to be (greek claim) in paranthesis no matter how much youre willing to argue.
Diff · History 1
Diff · History -1 (reverted)  I see where youre going, keep using your propaganda, 4000 killed, 1000 POW, 11000 fled the island, hundreds died while trying to escape, Keep using wikipedia as your main source of propaganda we know what kind of hell turkey brought down on those cruel and sadistic greeks in 1974 🥱👍
Diff · History 14 (reverted)  It is required to stay as greek claim until you pull up a trustable non state ran source, if you look throughout wikipedia every state ran source is a claim, not a fact... Western propagandists..
Diff · History 542 (reverted)  Undid revision 1167940425 by GGT (talk) State ran greek sources being used, just because some guy on the internet that doesnt have access to the said references, it doesnt make the entire reference false, and again, Greek state ran sources, so its (GREEK CLAIM)... Kendine üzül be adam, bide ana dilin türk.
Diff · History 542 (reverted)  Undid revision 1167813979 by Demetrios1993 (talk) Poor you if you dont have access to the said books. I see what youre talking about, added turkish claim saying 4k greek soldiers killed
Diff · History 1 (reverted) 
Diff · History -1 (reverted)  And would you think turkish government would even allow a single cypriot to go through the DMZ here to do some researches especially to find dead bodies? No, they would never, and infact theres no archives proving that they did their "dna tests" in turkish territory.. If you want to gonna keep extending this argument, add (Turkish claim) under the 4000 experienced greek super soldiers who were killed, even tho they are not state ran sources... hahaha..
Diff · History 225 (reverted)  And youre using DNA tests as a proof, Can you tell me they can just bring in scientist from south cyprus let them walk around war zones pass the UN DMZ and let them through NORTHERN CYPRUS AND DO THE DNA TESTS THERE? No. All that DNA tests, even if theyre real, are limited to soldiers who were even found on southern cyprus theres alot of dudes just dug into the ground laying dead who arent even found. So its still lacking.
Diff · History 327 (reverted)  Undid revision 1167646233 by Demetrios1993 (talk) Yeah whatever if i used turkish state ran sources, even tho these are not, youd say its biased but when its greek its factual sigh.. "WAA WA DNA TEST! 🤓" How about you go ahead and add all the turkish cypriots that were massacred and was on the brink of a genocide before the landings had even started,
Diff · History 5 (reverted) 
Diff · History 9 (reverted) 
Diff · History 298 (reverted)  extra sources
Diff · History 15 (reverted)  The sources that state the amount of killed greek soldiers are state ran cyprus sources, even tho they might be real it is still greece claim.
Diff · History 211 (reverted)  Undid revision 1159542540 by Khirurg (talk) Jesus christ you guys do not understand, the number of "confirmed greek and cypriot soldiers" in any of the sources shown do not exist, its all civillian and soldier combined.
Diff · History 211 (reverted)  Undid revision 1159414445 by Demetrios1993 (talk) Bud again, in the sources given by the obvious greek ultra nationalists, it never states "confirmed greek soldiers KIA", it just says the total amount of civillian and soldiers killed. And the sources i have put arent outdated and come from the same date as the other sources given, you stop this mind buggle and propaganda..
Diff · History 211 (reverted)  Sigh, another issue is that when i add more sources to back up these i just checked the sources non of them mention like "this amount of greek soldiers were killed" its all mixed civillian and military
Diff · History 214 Again i dont know how you just instantly remove sources from old times yet you yourself use outdated sources, again turkey wouldnt have invaded the island succesffully if their casualties were much higher and youre just trying to show as if turkey won the war by killing over 5 thousand civillians, okay brother...
Diff · History -6 mathematical correction
Diff · History 7
Diff · History 251 Theres no way turkey wouldve invaded the island if the losses were higher on their side. And the references i have put clearly state that over 4 thousand cypriot and greek soldiers were killed
All times are in UTC.
  NODES
admin 2
INTERN 1
Project 1