Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Page | Talk:Technical analysis (Log · Page History) |
| User | Sposer (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 137 |
| Minor edits | 14 (10.2%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 1 (0.7%) |
| Reverted edits | 2 (1.5%) |
| atbe1 | 15.3 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 122,736 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -4,674 |
Minor edits
·
14 (10.2%)
Major edits
·
123 (89.8%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
1 (0.7%)
Manual edits
·
136 (99.3%)
Reverted edits
·
2 (1.5%)
Unreverted edits
·
135 (98.5%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-01-05 20:19 | Diff · History | 873 | →Pseudoscience?: |
| 2012-09-12 09:51 | Diff · History | 636 | →Latest Lede Change Sections and Forecasting: |
| 2012-09-10 19:45 | Diff · History | 925 | →Latest Lede Change Sections and Forecasting: new section |
| 2012-09-07 19:28 | Diff · History | 1,632 | →Problematic sentence in the lede: |
| 2012-09-07 16:33 | Diff · History | 944 | →Problematic sentence in the lede: |
| 2012-09-07 05:32 | Diff · History | 171 | →Problematic sentence in the lede: cleaning up |
| 2012-09-07 05:29 | Diff · History | 1,665 | →Problematic sentence in the lede: |
| 2012-09-07 04:00 | Diff · History | 871 | →Problematic sentence in the lede: NO OR HERE! |
| 2012-09-07 03:07 | Diff · History | 3,078 | →Problematic sentence in the lede: |
| 2012-09-04 17:22 | Diff · History | 1,860 | →Problematic sentence in the lede: |
| 2012-09-04 00:57 | Diff · History | 142 | →Pseudoscience?: |
| 2012-09-04 00:54 | Diff · History | 323 | →Pseudoscience?: |
| 2012-09-04 00:52 | Diff · History | 610 | →Pseudoscience?: |
| 2012-09-03 18:54 | Diff · History | 214 | →Pseudoscience?: |
| 2012-09-03 18:52 | Diff · History | 1,359 | →Pseudoscience?: NOT ONE BIT! |
| 2012-02-25 23:18 | Diff · History | 323 | →Second line of Intro section is NOT correct: |
| 2012-02-25 23:04 | Diff · History | 1,130 | →Second line of Intro section is NOT correct: |
| 2012-02-19 03:20 | Diff · History | 228 | →Second line of Intro section is NOT correct: |
| 2012-02-19 03:16 | Diff · History | 1,939 | →Second line of Intro section is NOT correct: |
| 2012-02-19 00:12 | Diff · History | 557 | →Second line of Intro section is NOT correct: |
| 2012-02-18 22:30 | Diff · History | 998 | →Second line of Intro section is NOT correct: |
| 2012-02-17 22:15 | Diff · History | 485 | →Second line of Intro section is NOT correct: |
| 2011-11-22 01:46 | Diff · History | 1,134 | →Second line of Intro section is NOT correct: |
| 2011-11-20 17:24 | Diff · History | 1,046 | →Second line of Intro section is NOT correct: |
| 2011-08-12 15:56 | Diff · History | 119 | →Intro too short?: |
| 2011-03-01 19:16 | Diff · History | 150 | →NPOV: |
| 2011-03-01 17:01 | Diff · History | 324 | →NPOV: |
| 2011-03-01 11:18 | Diff · History | 672 | →NPOV: |
| 2011-02-25 20:48 | Diff · History | 963 | →Recent Removals: |
| 2011-02-25 20:16 | Diff · History | 473 | →Recent Removals: |
| 2011-02-25 20:11 | Diff · History | 2,286 | →Recent Removals: |
| 2011-02-25 11:14 | Diff · History | 512 | →Recent Removals: |
| 2011-02-25 11:09 | Diff · History | 1,073 | →Recent Removals: |
| 2011-02-24 21:12 | Diff · History | 897 | →Added ref for Industry section and explain revert: new section |
| 2010-10-14 23:47 | Diff · History | 101 | →Which Indicators to Present in the Main Article: |
| 2010-10-14 00:59 | Diff · History | -635 | Reverting my edit as I misunderstood statment above... |
| 2010-10-14 00:58 | Diff · History | 635 | (reverted) →Random Walk Hypothesis: |
| 2010-10-12 21:15 | Diff · History | 598 | →Random Walk Hypothesis: |
| 2010-01-27 18:52 | Diff · History | 269 | →Mislabeling of Point & Figure: |
| 2010-01-26 01:34 | Diff · History | 409 | →John Murphy: |
| 2010-01-15 01:37 | Diff · History | 436 | →Drummond Geometry: |
| 2010-01-13 23:06 | Diff · History | 1,152 | →Drummond Geometry: |
| 2010-01-13 15:49 | Diff · History | 488 | Drummond Geometry |
| 2010-01-07 11:21 | Diff · History | 144 | →Adding links to the article: |
| 2010-01-07 11:19 | Diff · History | 129 | Commercial site |
| 2009-06-13 05:41 | Diff · History | 76 | |
| 2009-06-13 05:40 | Diff · History | 282 | Self published book not RS? |
| 2009-06-04 21:23 | Diff · History | 764 | →Market Technicians Association promotion: |
| 2009-06-04 19:29 | Diff · History | 1,301 | →Market Technicians Association promotion: |
| 2008-11-18 17:17 | Diff · History | 818 | a bit of decorum please |
| 2008-09-28 13:13 | Diff · History | 249 | →Removed statement: |
| 2008-09-28 13:12 | Diff · History | 180 | →"Technical analysis is widely used among traders and financial professionals, but is considered in academia to be pseudoscience": |
| 2008-09-27 13:30 | Diff · History | 503 | →Removed statement: |
| 2008-09-27 13:27 | Diff · History | 1,136 | →"Technical analysis is widely used among traders and financial professionals, but is considered in academia to be pseudoscience": |
| 2008-04-24 13:12 | Diff · History | 1,703 | To cast or not to cast |
| 2008-04-15 20:51 | Diff · History | 2,138 | →Pseudoscience: and quants |
| 2008-04-15 19:14 | Diff · History | 1,592 | →Pseudoscience: and future edits of the article |
| 2008-04-15 19:03 | Diff · History | 1,108 | →Malkiel Quote on chartist giving buy signal: |
| 2008-04-13 22:11 | Diff · History | 3,076 | Pseudoscience tag is bogus here. |
| 2008-04-13 21:10 | Diff · History | 1,183 | →Malkiel Quote on chartist giving buy signal: Fama quote added |
| 2008-04-13 13:47 | Diff · History | 1,522 | More on random walk |
| 2008-04-13 01:36 | Diff · History | 0 | Typo on test designation |
| 2008-04-13 01:17 | Diff · History | 1,101 | Pseudoscience |
| 2008-04-12 19:43 | Diff · History | 3,358 | →Malkiel Quote on chartist giving buy signal: |
| 2008-04-12 12:36 | Diff · History | 1,845 | →Malkiel Quote on chartist giving buy signal: |
| 2008-04-11 20:57 | Diff · History | 326 | →Malkiel Quote on chartist giving buy signal: |
| 2008-04-11 11:55 | Diff · History | 1,053 | Not an article on Malkiel's TA attacks |
| 2008-04-01 00:35 | Diff · History | 1,420 | →I think this article is ridiculous: |
| 2008-03-30 15:24 | Diff · History | 298 | |
| 2008-03-30 15:20 | Diff · History | 659 | →I think this article is ridiculous: |
| 2008-03-30 15:03 | Diff · History | 1,032 | →I think this article is ridiculous: |
| 2008-02-27 03:02 | Diff · History | 739 | →A question on definitions and principles of Technical Analysis?: |
| 2008-02-25 20:33 | Diff · History | 331 | Explanation for removal of random walk addition |
| 2008-02-25 20:22 | Diff · History | 660 | →Books: |
| 2007-11-07 01:16 | Diff · History | 589 | →Fair use rationale for Image:Headandsholderswrong.PNG: |
| 2007-09-03 01:52 | Diff · History | 270 | Quote is correct word for word, unless I missed a word someplace. Please feel free to correct any errors, for which I apologize ahead of time. |
| 2007-09-03 01:09 | Diff · History | 541 | →False Claims and/or Not Properly Sourced Claims: |
| 2007-09-02 00:41 | Diff · History | 167 | →False Claims and/or Not Properly Sourced Claims: |
| 2007-09-01 01:22 | Diff · History | 751 | |
| 2007-09-01 00:25 | Diff · History | 567 | →Too much focus of Astrology: |
| 2007-09-01 00:19 | Diff · History | 438 | →Recent Jonkozer edits: |
| 2007-08-31 12:58 | Diff · History | 1,562 | →Recent Jonkozer edits: |
| 2007-08-29 02:59 | Diff · History | 577 | →Recent Jonkozer edits: |
| 2007-08-28 03:43 | Diff · History | -1,797 | →Recent Jonkozer edits: |
| 2007-08-28 03:29 | Diff · History | -31 | →Recent Jonkozer edits: |
| 2007-08-28 03:06 | Diff · History | 1,567 | →Recent Jonkozer edits: |
| 2007-08-28 02:03 | Diff · History | 702 | →Technical analysis and astrology: |
| 2007-08-28 00:35 | Diff · History | 9 | fix wp:syn tag |
| 2007-08-28 00:21 | Diff · History | 913 | Recent jonkozer edits |
| 2007-08-24 03:41 | Diff · History | 1,822 | →Authority of the MTA: |
| 2007-08-14 00:51 | Diff · History | 241 | |
| 2007-08-13 13:05 | Diff · History | 576 | →Can other editors please weigh in here and help us get a consensus: |
| 2007-08-01 14:34 | Diff · History | 826 | →WSJ Europe Article: |
| 2007-08-01 01:37 | Diff · History | 1,673 | |
| 2007-07-31 23:24 | Diff · History | 1,537 | |
| 2007-07-31 19:20 | Diff · History | 432 | →WSJ Europe Article: |
| 2007-07-31 19:02 | Diff · History | 405 | WSJ Europe article adds nothing to the article |
| 2007-07-30 14:00 | Diff · History | 840 | →Flagrant POV violation with quote in the lead: |
| 2007-07-30 01:48 | Diff · History | -53 | →Financial astrology see also link: |
| 2007-07-30 00:56 | Diff · History | 1,970 | Linking TA article to financial astrology is ridiculous. |
| 2007-07-27 23:17 | Diff · History | 2,140 | Undid revision 147556334 by Sposer (talk) and question on source of misitry's quote |
| 2007-07-27 23:13 | Diff · History | -1,819 | What is the source in contradiction to Nison's quote? |
| 2007-07-27 01:39 | Diff · History | 403 | additional info on CMT |
| 2007-07-27 01:35 | Diff · History | 6,583 | Reverting accidental deletion |
| 2007-07-27 01:32 | Diff · History | -6,583 | (reverted) CMT explanation |
| 2007-07-27 01:08 | Diff · History | 266 | additional info on CMT |
| 2007-07-26 14:06 | Diff · History | 653 | →Excessive weight given to Efficient Markets Theory: |
| 2007-07-26 02:00 | Diff · History | 2,778 | AOL chart and the article in general |
| 2007-07-26 00:49 | Diff · History | 443 | |
| 2007-07-25 23:10 | Diff · History | -198 | |
| 2007-07-25 23:04 | Diff · History | 831 | I said I agreed on the removal of the Greenspan quote. |
| 2007-07-25 21:16 | Diff · History | 457 | |
| 2007-07-25 21:14 | Diff · History | -139 | Twisting words |
| 2007-07-25 21:09 | Diff · History | 450 | Academia and TA |
| 2007-07-25 20:58 | Diff · History | 793 | |
| 2007-07-25 19:18 | Diff · History | 1,870 | →Greenspan: |
| 2007-07-22 16:23 | Diff · History | 465 | |
| 2007-07-21 01:57 | Diff · History | 1,201 | Experts needed? |
| 2007-07-20 21:15 | Diff · History | 1,406 | The Fed |
| 2007-07-20 20:47 | Diff · History | 1,980 | Greenspan |
| 2007-07-19 02:40 | Diff · History | -2 | |
| 2007-07-19 02:39 | Diff · History | 850 | Reputable finance professors |
| 2007-07-19 01:31 | Diff · History | 708 | |
| 2007-07-18 22:47 | Diff · History | 0 | |
| 2007-07-18 22:45 | Diff · History | 1,799 | Why NPOV tag does not belong |
| 2007-07-18 21:00 | Diff · History | 1,345 | More on papers and NPOV |
| 2007-07-18 18:22 | Diff · History | 830 | NPOV rebuttal |
| 2007-06-14 20:22 | Diff · History | 1,842 | Summary |
| 2007-06-14 20:01 | Diff · History | 26 | Added tag to separate comments by sposer and rgfolsom |
| 2007-06-14 13:03 | Diff · History | 3,498 | Attempting to reach a resolution |
| 2007-06-14 01:26 | Diff · History | 40 | |
| 2007-06-14 00:40 | Diff · History | 1,276 | ad infinitum |
| 2007-06-13 15:50 | Diff · History | 649 | Misleading statements regarding definition of TA |
| 2007-06-11 02:43 | Diff · History | 379 | →Unhelpful edits: |
| 2007-06-11 02:41 | Diff · History | 129 | Rational analysis link |
| 2007-04-05 23:58 | Diff · History | 2,265 | →Greenspan: |
| 2007-04-04 21:43 | Diff · History | 615 | →Greenspan: |
All times are in UTC.